Literature DB >> 23478137

Masking of sounds by a background noise--cochlear mechanical correlates.

Alberto Recio-Spinoso1, Nigel P Cooper.   

Abstract

In the search for cochlear correlates of auditory masking by noise stimuli, we recorded basilar membrane (BM) vibrations evoked by either tone or click signals in the presence of varying levels of background noise. The BM vibrations were recorded from basal regions in healthy cochleae of anaesthetized chinchilla and gerbil. Non-linear interactions that could underpin various aspects of psychophysical masking data, including both compression and suppression at the BM level, were observed. The suppression effects, whereby the amplitude of the responses to each stimulus component could be reduced, depended on the relative intensities of the noise and the tones or clicks. Only stimulus components whose frequencies fell inside the non-linear region of the recording site, i.e. around its characteristic frequency (CF), were affected by presentation of the 'suppressing' stimulus (which could be either the tone or the noise). Mutual suppression, the simultaneous reduction of the responses to both tones and noise components, was observed under some conditions, but overall reductions of BM vibration were rarely observed. Moderate- to high-intensity tones suppressed BM responses to low-intensity Gaussian stimuli, including both broadband and narrowband noise. Suppression effects were larger for spectral components of the noise response that were closer to the CF. In this regime, the tone and noise stimuli became the suppressor and probe signals, respectively. This study provides the first detailed observations of cochlear mechanical correlates of the masking effects of noise. Mechanical detection thresholds for tone signals, which were arbitrarily defined using three criteria, are shown to increase in almost direct proportion to the noise level for low and moderately high noise levels, in a manner that resembles the findings of numerous psychophysical observations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23478137      PMCID: PMC3678051          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.248260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  25 in total

1.  The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane. III. Intensity effects.

Authors:  E de Boer; A L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Representation of harmonic complex stimuli in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the chinchilla.

Authors:  A Recio
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Multicomponent stimulus interactions observed in basilar-membrane vibration in the basal region of the chinchilla cochlea.

Authors:  W S Rhode; A Recio
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  What's new in visual masking?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Hawkins and Stevens revisited with insert earphones.

Authors:  Adrianus J M Houtsma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Temporal measures and neural strategies for detection of tones in noise based on responses in anteroventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Yan Gai; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Basilar membrane responses to noise at a basal site of the chinchilla cochlea: quasi-linear filtering.

Authors:  Alberto Recio-Spinoso; Shyamla S Narayan; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-06-03

8.  Two-tone suppression of basilar membrane vibrations in the base of the guinea pig cochlea using "low-side" suppressors.

Authors:  C D Geisler; A L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Psychophysics of normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.291

10.  Two-tone suppression and distortion production on the basilar membrane in the hook region of cat and guinea pig cochleae.

Authors:  W S Rhode; N P Cooper
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  8 in total

1.  Nonadditivity of forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Adam Svec; Suyash N Joshi; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The Interplay Between Spike-Time and Spike-Rate Modes in the Auditory Nerve Encodes Tone-In-Noise Threshold.

Authors:  Antoine Huet; Gilles Desmadryl; Thomas Justal; Régis Nouvian; Jean-Luc Puel; Jérôme Bourien
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Mechanisms and mechanics of auditory masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Why Do Hearing Aids Fail to Restore Normal Auditory Perception?

Authors:  Nicholas A Lesica
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 5.  Mechanisms of auditory masking in marine mammals.

Authors:  Brian K Branstetter; Jillian M Sills
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.899

6.  Asymmetry and Microstructure of Temporal-Suppression Patterns in Basilar-Membrane Responses to Clicks: Relation to Tonal Suppression and Traveling-Wave Dispersion.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Wei Dong; Alessandro Altoè; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-03-12

7.  Inconsistent Effect of Arousal on Early Auditory Perception.

Authors:  Anna C Bolders; Guido P H Band; Pieter Jan M Stallen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-29

8.  Cochlear impulse responses resolved into sets of gammatones: the case for beating of closely spaced local resonances.

Authors:  Andrew Bell; Hero P Wit
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.