Literature DB >> 17546745

Working memory and the guidance of visual attention: consonance-driven orienting.

Liqiang Huang1, Harold Pashler.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigated the potential role of the content of working memory in guiding visual attention. Experiment 1 showed that maintaining a shape in working memory resulted in a decisive preference for moving attention to the same shape in the background when those shapes were task irrelevant. Experiment 2 showed a similar preference for words that were semantically related to an item held in working memory. We suggest that keeping an item active in working memory automatically results in a tendency for attention to be "attracted" to stimuli that are related to that item either visually or semantically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17546745     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  9 in total

1.  Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention.

Authors:  P E Downing
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-11

2.  The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.

Authors:  C B Neely; D C LeCompte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

3.  Do images involuntarily trigger search? A test of Pillsbury's hypothesis.

Authors:  H Pashler; L P Shiu
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

4.  Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention.

Authors:  Elisabeth Moores; Liana Laiti; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Inhibitory mechanisms of attention in identification and localization tasks: time course and disruption.

Authors:  S P Tipper; B Weaver; S Cameron; J C Brehaut; J Bastedo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Exogenous orienting does not reflect an encapsulated set of processes.

Authors:  J A Stolz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Semantic and spatial components of selective attention.

Authors:  V J Dark; K G Vochatzer; B A Van Voorhis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Word recognition and temporal order judgments: semantics turns back the clock.

Authors:  J A Stolz
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1999-12

Review 9.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

  9 in total
  20 in total

1.  Directed forgetting and directed remembering in visual working memory.

Authors:  Melonie Williams; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Working memory and target-related distractor effects on visual search.

Authors:  Alex Bahrami Balani; David Soto; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

3.  How visual working memory contents influence priming of visual attention.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-12

4.  Common and distinct neural regions for the guidance of selection by visuoverbal information held in memory: converging evidence from fMRI and rTMS.

Authors:  David Soto; Pia Rotshtein; John Hodsoll; Carmel Mevorach; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The success of the representation maintenance affects the memory-guided search processing: an ERP study.

Authors:  Min Wang; Ping Yang; Zhenlan Jin; Junjun Zhang; Ling Li
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Using a model of hypothesis generation to predict eye movements in a visual search task.

Authors:  Daniel R Buttaccio; Nicholas D Lange; Rick P Thomas; Michael R Dougherty
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-02

7.  When memory is not enough: electrophysiological evidence for goal-dependent use of working memory representations in guiding visual attention.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Quantifying the Attentional Impact of Working Memory Matching Targets and Distractors.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-06-27

9.  Enhanced memory for scenes presented at behaviorally relevant points in time.

Authors:  Jeffrey Y Lin; Amanda D Pype; Scott O Murray; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Indirect assessment of visual working memory for simple and complex objects.

Authors:  Tal Makovski; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.