Literature DB >> 22409182

Directed forgetting and directed remembering in visual working memory.

Melonie Williams1, Geoffrey F Woodman.   

Abstract

A defining characteristic of visual working memory is its limited capacity. This means that it is crucial to maintain only the most relevant information in visual working memory. However, empirical research is mixed as to whether it is possible to selectively maintain a subset of the information previously encoded into visual working memory. Here we examined the ability of participants to use cues to either forget or remember a subset of the information already stored in visual working memory. In Experiment 1, participants were cued to either forget or remember 1 of 2 groups of colored squares during a change-detection task. We found that both types of cues aided performance in the visual working memory task but that observers benefited more from a cue to remember than a cue to forget a subset of the objects. In Experiment 2, we show that the previous findings, which indicated that directed-forgetting cues are ineffective, were likely due to the presence of invalid cues that appeared to cause observers to disregard such cues as unreliable. In Experiment 3, we recorded event-related potentials and show that an electrophysiological index of focused maintenance is elicited by cues that indicate which subset of information in visual working memory needs to be remembered, ruling out alternative explanations of the behavioral effects of retention-interval cues. The present findings demonstrate that observers can focus maintenance mechanisms on specific objects in visual working memory based on cues indicating future task relevance. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22409182      PMCID: PMC3817833          DOI: 10.1037/a0027389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  46 in total

1.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  E K Vogel; G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis.

Authors:  A Miyake; N P Friedman; M J Emerson; A H Witzki; A Howerter; T D Wager
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.

Authors:  Ivan C Griffin; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Visual attention and the semantics of space: beyond central and peripheral cues.

Authors:  Bradley S Gibson; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-07

6.  The time course of consolidation in visual working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Distributing versus focusing attention in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Tal Makovsik; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

8.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Contralateral delay activity provides a neural measure of the number of representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Akiko Ikkai; Andrew W McCollough; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  33 in total

1.  Perturbing Neural Representations of Working Memory with Task-irrelevant Interruption.

Authors:  Nicole Hakim; Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations.

Authors:  Eren Gunseli; Dirk van Moorselaar; Martijn Meeter; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

3.  Working memory is not fixed-capacity: More active storage capacity for real-world objects than for simple stimuli.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Viola S Störmer; George A Alvarez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Can you voluntarily forget what you are planning to forget? Behavioral evidence for the underlying truth of the cost-benefit principle.

Authors:  Zhili Han; Yidong Yang; Qun Zhang; Lei Mo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-04-21

5.  Internal attention to features in visual short-term memory guides object learning.

Authors:  Judith E Fan; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-08-15

6.  Invalid retro-cues can eliminate the retro-cue benefit: Evidence for a hybridized account.

Authors:  Filiz Gözenman; Ryan T Tanoue; Terina Metoyer; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Control of Working Memory in Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.478

8.  Strategic trade-offs between quantity and quality in working memory.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; Sarah M Cormiea; Anish Kanabar; George A Alvarez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The strategic retention of task-relevant objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Ashleigh M Maxcey-Richard; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The benefit of forgetting.

Authors:  Melonie Williams; Sang W Hong; Min-Suk Kang; Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.