Literature DB >> 12198782

Do images involuntarily trigger search? A test of Pillsbury's hypothesis.

H Pashler1, L P Shiu.   

Abstract

Pillsbury (1908) suggested that deciding to search for something in a scene consists of nothing more than forming a visual image of the target. If so, imaging should trigger search even when it would be more advantageous not to search. Subjects were cued to form an image of a specified object (e.g., tiger) and to press a key when they had done so. This initiated the presentation of a sequence of pictures, with a single target digit interspersed; the subject's task was to report this digit. The sequence contained a picture of the same type of object that the subject had just imaged (e.g., a tiger), either before or after the target digit. If this picture was detected involuntarily, an attentional blink should have impaired digit detection when the picture preceded the digit. This was confirmed in two experiments, even when instructions specifically encouraged subjects to discard the image and to avoid searching for it. The results support Pillsbury's hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 12198782     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  5 in total

1.  Pictures and words in visual search.

Authors:  A Paivio; I Begg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1974-05

2.  Semantic and spatial components of selective attention.

Authors:  V J Dark; K G Vochatzer; B A Van Voorhis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  From detection to identification: response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  D E Broadbent; M H Broadbent
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-08

4.  Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  K L Shapiro; J E Raymond; K M Arnell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Processing of words presented simultaneously to eye and ear.

Authors:  H A Rollins; R Hendricks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.332

  5 in total
  22 in total

1.  The impact of auditory distraction on retrieval of visual memories.

Authors:  Peter E Wais; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

2.  Working memory and the guidance of visual attention: consonance-driven orienting.

Authors:  Liqiang Huang; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

3.  Attentional control and competition between episodic representations.

Authors:  Elkan G Akyürek; Anna Schubö; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-08-02

4.  Neural mechanisms underlying the impact of visual distraction on retrieval of long-term memory.

Authors:  Peter E Wais; Michael T Rubens; Jacqueline Boccanfuso; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The impact of visual distraction on episodic retrieval in older adults.

Authors:  Peter E Wais; Grant M Martin; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 6.  Working memory as internal attention: toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

Review 7.  The attentional blink: past, present, and future of a blind spot in perceptual awareness.

Authors:  Sander Martens; Brad Wyble
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Attentional rubbernecking: cognitive control and personality in emotion-induced blindness.

Authors:  Steven B Most; Marvin M Chun; David M Widders; David H Zald
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

9.  Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search?

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  External distraction impairs categorization performance in older adults.

Authors:  Peter E Wais; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2014-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.