Literature DB >> 16521764

Comodulation detection differences for fixed-frequency and roved-frequency maskers.

Joseph W Hall1, Emily Buss, John H Grose.   

Abstract

This study investigated comodulation detection differences (CDD) for fixed- and roved-frequency maskers. The objective was to determine whether CDD could be accounted for better in terms of energetic masking or in terms of perceptual fusion/segregation related to comodulation. Roved-frequency maskers were used in order to minimize the role of energetic masking, allowing possible effects related to perceptual fusion/segregation to be revealed. The signals and maskers were composed of 30-Hz-wide noise bands. The signal was either comodulated with the masker (A/A condition) or had a temporal envelope that was independent (A/B condition). The masker was either gated synchronously with the signal or had a leading temporal fringe of 200 ms. In the fixed-frequency masker conditions, listeners with low A/A thresholds showed little masking release due to masker temporal fringe and had CDDs that could be accounted for by energetic masking. Listeners with higher A/A thresholds in the fixed-frequency masker conditions showed relatively large CDDs and large masking release due to a masker temporal fringe. The CDDs of these listeners may have arisen, at least in part, from processes related to perceptual segregation. Some listeners in the roved masker conditions also had large CDDs that appeared to be related to perceptual segregation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16521764      PMCID: PMC2646379          DOI: 10.1121/1.2151788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  22 in total

1.  Temporal decline of masking and comodulation detection differences.

Authors:  D McFadden; B A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Informational masking and auditory attention.

Authors:  M R Leek; M E Brown; M F Dorman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-09

3.  Comodulation detection differences with multiple signal bands.

Authors:  B A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  How much masking is informational masking?

Authors:  R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Masking produced by spectral uncertainty with multicomponent maskers.

Authors:  D L Neff; D M Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-05

6.  Comodulation detection differences using noise-band signals.

Authors:  D McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effective properties of multicomponent simultaneous maskers under conditions of uncertainty.

Authors:  D L Neff; B P Callaghan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis.

Authors:  J W Hall; M P Haggard; M A Fernandes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Spectral integration based on common amplitude modulation.

Authors:  A S Bregman; J Abramson; P Doehring; C J Darwin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-05
View more
  4 in total

1.  Binaural comodulation masking release: effects of masker interaural correlation.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comodulation detection differences in children and adults.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Within- and across-channel factors in the multiband comodulation masking release paradigm.

Authors:  John H Grose; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Infants' use of isolated and combined temporal cues in speech sound segregation.

Authors:  Monika-Maria Oster; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.840

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.