Literature DB >> 32554549

Tinnitus Does Not Interfere with Auditory and Speech Perception.

Fan-Gang Zeng1, Matthew Richardson2, Katie Turner2.   

Abstract

Tinnitus is a sound heard by 15% of the general population in the absence of any external sound. Because external sounds can sometimes mask tinnitus, tinnitus is assumed to affect the perception of external sounds, leading to hypotheses such as "tinnitus filling in the temporal gap" in animal models and "tinnitus inducing hearing difficulty" in human subjects. Here we compared performance in temporal, spectral, intensive, masking and speech-in-noise perception tasks between 45 human listeners with chronic tinnitus (18 females and 27 males with a range of ages and degrees of hearing loss) and 27 young, normal-hearing listeners without tinnitus (11 females and 16 males). After controlling for age, hearing loss, and stimulus variables, we discovered that, contradictory to the widely held assumption, tinnitus does not interfere with the perception of external sounds in 32 of the 36 measures. We interpret the present result to reflect a bottom-up pathway for the external sound and a separate top-down pathway for tinnitus. We propose that these two perceptual pathways can be independently modulated by attention, which leads to the asymmetrical interaction between external and internal sounds, and several other puzzling tinnitus phenomena such as discrepancy in loudness between tinnitus rating and matching. The present results suggest not only a need for new theories involving attention and central noise in animal tinnitus models but also a shift in focus from treating tinnitus to managing its comorbid conditions when addressing complaints about hearing difficulty in individuals with tinnitus.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Tinnitus, or ringing in the ears, is a neurologic disorder that affects 15% of the general population. Here we discovered an asymmetrical relationship between tinnitus and external sounds: although external sounds have been widely used to cover up tinnitus, tinnitus does not impair, and sometimes even improves, the perception of external sounds. This counterintuitive discovery contradicts the general belief held by scientists, clinicians, and even individuals with tinnitus themselves, who often report hearing difficulty, especially in noise. We attribute the counterintuitive discovery to two independent pathways: the bottom-up perception of external sounds and the top-down perception of tinnitus. Clinically, the present work suggests a shift in focus from treating tinnitus itself to treating its comorbid conditions and secondary effects.
Copyright © 2020 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal model; attention; auditory perception; neural noise; speech recognition; tinnitus

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32554549      PMCID: PMC7392513          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0396-20.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  94 in total

1.  Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Kaibao Nie; Ginger S Stickney; Ying-Yee Kong; Michael Vongphoe; Ashish Bhargave; Chaogang Wei; Keli Cao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Severe tinnitus and its effect on selective and divided attention.

Authors:  Catherine Stevens; Gary Walker; Morten Boyer; Melinda Gallagher
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 3.  Tinnitus.

Authors:  David Baguley; Don McFerran; Deborah Hall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Influence of cochlear function on auditory temporal resolution in tinnitus patients.

Authors:  Seisse Gabriela Gandolfi Sanches; Tanit Ganz Sanchez; Renata Mota Mamede Carvallo
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Psychoacoustic characterization of the tinnitus spectrum: implications for the underlying mechanisms of tinnitus.

Authors:  Arnaud Norena; Christophe Micheyl; Sylviane Chéry-Croze; Lionel Collet
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Noise-induced cochlear neuropathy is selective for fibers with low spontaneous rates.

Authors:  Adam C Furman; Sharon G Kujawa; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds.

Authors:  N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Altered top-down cognitive control and auditory processing in tinnitus: evidences from auditory and visual spatial stroop.

Authors:  Rodrigo Araneda; Anne G De Volder; Naïma Deggouj; Pierre Philippot; Alexandre Heeren; Emilie Lacroix; Monique Decat; Philippe Rombaux; Laurent Renier
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.406

9.  Tinnitus Synthesis: Fluctuant and Stable Matches to the Pitch of Tinnitus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Tinnitus J       Date:  1995

10.  The Gap Detection Test: Can It Be Used to Diagnose Tinnitus?

Authors:  Kris Boyen; Deniz Başkent; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  13 in total

1.  An Auditory Phantom Percept That Does Not Impair External Sound Perception.

Authors:  Kameron K Clayton; Elouise A Koops
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Macrostructural Changes of the Acoustic Radiation in Humans with Hearing Loss and Tinnitus Revealed with Fixel-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Elouise A Koops; Shereif Haykal; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Animal models of hidden hearing loss: Does auditory-nerve-fiber loss cause real-world listening difficulties?

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.314

4.  Association of Tinnitus with Depression in a Normal Hearing Population.

Authors:  Jay Choi; Chang Ho Lee; So Young Kim
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.430

5.  The impact of tinnitus distress on cognition.

Authors:  P Neff; J Simões; S Psatha; A Nyamaa; B Boecking; L Rausch; J Dettling-Papargyris; C Funk; P Brueggemann; B Mazurek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Sensorineural Hearing Loss Affects Functional Connectivity of the Auditory Cortex, Parahippocampal Gyrus and Inferior Prefrontal Gyrus in Tinnitus Patients.

Authors:  Junming Chen; Yuanxin Zhao; Tuanming Zou; Xiaoling Wen; Xiaowei Zhou; Youjun Yu; Zhen Liu; Meige Li
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 7.  Hearing loss and brain plasticity: the hyperactivity phenomenon.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Blake E Butler
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.270

Review 8.  Auditory thalamus dysfunction and pathophysiology in tinnitus: a predictive network hypothesis.

Authors:  Pia Brinkmann; Sonja A Kotz; Jasper V Smit; Marcus L F Janssen; Michael Schwartze
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 3.270

9.  Task-dependent effects of nicotine treatment on auditory performance in young-adult and elderly human nonsmokers.

Authors:  Shuping Sun; Michelle R Kapolowicz; Matthew Richardson; Raju Metherate; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  Tinnitus impairs segregation of competing speech in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Yang Wenyi Liu; Bing Wang; Bing Chen; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.