Literature DB >> 18397027

Comodulation detection differences in children and adults.

Joseph W Hall1, Emily Buss, John H Grose.   

Abstract

This study investigated comodulation detection differences (CDD) in children (ages 4.8-10.1 years) and adults. The signal was 30-Hz wide band of noise centered on 2 kHz, and the masker consisted of six 30-Hz wide bands of noise spanning center frequencies from 870 to 4160 Hz. The envelopes of the masking bands were always comodulated, and the envelope of the signal was either comodulated or random with respect to the masker. In some conditions, the maskers were gated on prior to the signal in order to minimize effects related to perceptual fusion of the signal and masker. CDD was computed as the difference between signal detection thresholds in conditions where all bands were comodulated and conditions where the envelope of the signal was random with respect to the envelopes of the maskers. Values of CDD were generally small in children compared to adults. In contrast, masking release related to masker/signal onset asynchrony was comparable across age groups. The small CDDs in children are discussed in terms of sensitivity to comodulation as a perceptual fusion cue and informational masking associated with the detection of a signal in a complex background, an effect that is ameliorated by asynchronous onset.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18397027      PMCID: PMC2633723          DOI: 10.1121/1.2839006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  Informational masking with small set sizes.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Zhongzhou Tang; Gerald D Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Evidence that comodulation detection differences depend on within-channel mechanisms.

Authors:  Stephen J Borrill; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Rhythmic masking release: contribution of cues for perceptual organization to the cross-spectral fusion of concurrent narrow-band noises.

Authors:  Martine Turgeon; Albert S Bregman; Pierre A Ahad
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Tests of a within-channel account of comodulation detection differences.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Stephen J Borrill
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Informational masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Tanya L Arbogast; Christine R Mason; Michael Walsh
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-06

6.  Informational masking caused by contralateral stimulation.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Tanya L Arbogast; Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Masking produced by spectral uncertainty with multicomponent maskers.

Authors:  D L Neff; D M Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-05

8.  Comodulation detection differences using noise-band signals.

Authors:  D McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The effect of cross-spectrum correlation on the detectability of a noise band.

Authors:  M F Cohen; E D Schubert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  5 in total

1.  A detection-theoretic framework for modeling informational masking.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; An-Chieh Chang; Jacob Stamas; Lynn Gilbertson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Infants use onset asynchrony cues in auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Monika-Maria Oster; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose; Patricia A Roush
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Difference in precedence effect between children and adults signifies development of sound localization abilities in complex listening tasks.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Shelly P Godar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Infants' use of isolated and combined temporal cues in speech sound segregation.

Authors:  Monika-Maria Oster; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.840

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.