Literature DB >> 17539785

Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.

Afsun Sahin1, Leyla Niyaz, Nilgun Yildirim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the agreement between the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) by the rebound tonometer (RBT) and by the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and to find out the effect of central corneal thickness (CCT) values on IOP measurements in glaucoma patients.
METHODS: IOP was measured with the RBT and GAT, respectively, in 61 eyes of 61 glaucoma patients. CCT was measured using an ultrasonic pachymeter after all IOP determinations had been made. The mean IOP measurement by the RBT was compared with the measurement by the GAT, by Student's t-test. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to assess the clinical agreement between the two methods. The effect of CCT on measured IOP was explored by linear regression analysis.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 56.7+/-21.1 years (range: 30-80 years). There were 32 (52.46%) women and 29 (47.54%) men in the study group. The mean IOP readings were 18.70+/-4.76 mmHg using the RBT, and 18.27+/-3.49 mmHg using the GAT. The difference was not statistically significant (mean difference 0.43+/-2.55, P=0.2). A frequency distribution of the differences demonstrated that in more than 80% of cases the IOP readings differed by <2.3 mmHg between the RBT and GAT. There was a strong correlation between the RBT and GAT readings (r=0.852, P<0.0001). The IOP measurements with the two methods were correlated with CCT (r=0.40, P=0.02 for the RBT and r=0.48, P<0.0001 for the GAT). The IOP increased 1.1 mmHg and 8 mmHg for every 100-microm increase in CCT for the GAT and RBT, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The RBT slightly overestimated the IOP value by 0.43 mmHg on average when compared with the GAT. Nevertheless, the RBT readings appeared to be more affected by the various thicknesses of different corneas when compared with those obtained using the GAT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17539785     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01451.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Icare-ONE rebound tonometer as a self-measuring intraocular pressure device in normal subjects.

Authors:  Ioannis Halkiadakis; Aimilianos Stratos; George Stergiopoulos; Eleni Patsea; Sotiris Skouriotis; Panagiotis Mitropoulos; Dimitrios Papaconstantinou; Gerasimos Georgopoulos
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Fatih Özcura; Nilgün Yildirim; Afsun Şahin; Ertuğrul Çolak
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  IOP agreement between I-Care TA01 rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer in eyes with and without glaucoma.

Authors:  Gautam Sinha; Shikha Gupta; Shreyas Temkar; Veena Pandey; Ramanjit Sihota; Tanuj Dada
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  [Comparison of the iCare tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in Malawi].

Authors:  J Hohmann; M Schulze-Schwering; T Chirambo Nyaka; V Moyo; P C Kayange; D Doycheva; N H Batumba; M S Spitzer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  [Evaluation of the self-tonometer Icare ONE in comparison to Goldmann applanation tonometry].

Authors:  V Witte; Ä Glass; R Beck; R Guthoff
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 6.  The thick and thin of the central corneal thickness in glaucoma.

Authors:  Graham W Belovay; Ivan Goldberg
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Comparison of IOPen rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer at different IOP levels.

Authors:  Fereydoun Farrahi; Farideh Sharifipour; Mohammad Malekahmadi; Bahman Cheraghian
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  The utility of rebound tonometer in late elderly subjects.

Authors:  Rei Sakata; Jiro Numaga
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  Can higher end tonometers be used interchangeably in routine clinical practice?

Authors:  Kunjan Jayantilal Patel; Saurabh P Jain; Priti R Kapadia; Nikunj V Patel; Saurabh Patel; Vikas Patel
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Comparison of handheld rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in children with glaucoma: a cohort study.

Authors:  Annegret Hella Dahlmann-Noor; Renata Puertas; Shenille Tabasa-Lim; Ahmed El-Karmouty; Mustafa Kadhim; Nicholas Kloster Wride; Amanda Lewis; Dawn Grosvenor; Poornima Rai; Maria Papadopoulos; John Brookes; Catey Bunce; Peng Tee Khaw
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.