Literature DB >> 25510295

IOP agreement between I-Care TA01 rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer in eyes with and without glaucoma.

Gautam Sinha1, Shikha Gupta2, Shreyas Temkar1, Veena Pandey1, Ramanjit Sihota1, Tanuj Dada1.   

Abstract

To analyze correlation of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement between new rebound tonometer (RBT) I-Care TA01 and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT). One hundred eighty-five eyes of 185 subjects presenting with glaucoma or cataract were enrolled in the study. In all patients, IOP was obtained by an ophthalmologist using I-Care TA01 and GAT. IOP between the two were compared at range of 8-15, 16-21, and >22 mmHg and difference was considered as significant at p < 0.05 (t test). Bland-Altman analysis tested agreement between instruments overall and for each subgroup of patients with glaucoma or no glaucoma (cataract only). Of 185 patients, 86 had glaucoma; 99 did not. Mean age of patients was 55.77 ± 14.46 years; with no difference between the two subgroups (p = 0.12). There was no significant difference in mean IOP between the two tonometers at IOP between 8-15 mmHg (p = 0.097) and 16-21 mmHg (p = 0.51). However, a significant difference was observed between the two at IOP > 22 mmHg (p = 0.023) with mean GAT (24.8 mmHg) being higher than mean RBT (23.16 mmHg). Overall, there was no difference between the two (p = 0.59) and they had a high correlation (Pearson correlation r = 0.815; p = 0.01). The mean difference between the two was 0.1 (95 % agreement limits: UL +6 (1.96SD), LL -5.8 (-1.96SD)), in patients with no glaucoma was 0.091 (95 % AL: UL +4.8 (1.96SD), LL -4.6 (-1.96SD)), and in patients with glaucoma was 0.151 (95 % AL: UL +7.25 (1.96SD), LL -6.9 (-1.96SD)). RBT I-Care TA01 and Goldmann tonometer cannot be used interchangeably due to large limits of agreement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agreement; Goldmann applanation tonometer; Rebound tonometer

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25510295     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-014-0026-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  15 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical data.

Authors:  Etsuo Chihara
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  Assessment of IcareONE rebound tonometer for self-measuring intraocular pressure.

Authors:  Mari Sakamoto; Akiyasu Kanamori; Masashi Fujihara; Yuko Yamada; Makoto Nakamura; Akira Negi
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 3.  Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers.

Authors:  M M Whitacre; R Stein
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 4.  The epidemiology of open-angle glaucoma: a review.

Authors:  M C Leske
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Comparison of rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry and correlation with central corneal thickness.

Authors:  M E Iliev; D Goldblum; K Katsoulis; C Amstutz; B Frueh
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  M L Salvetat; M Zeppieri; F Miani; C Tosoni; L Parisi; P Brusini
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Evelien Vandewalle; Sofie Vandenbroeck; Ingeborg Stalmans; Thierry Zeyen
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.597

8.  Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Afsun Sahin; Leyla Niyaz; Nilgun Yildirim
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Comparison of handheld rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in children with glaucoma: a cohort study.

Authors:  Annegret Hella Dahlmann-Noor; Renata Puertas; Shenille Tabasa-Lim; Ahmed El-Karmouty; Mustafa Kadhim; Nicholas Kloster Wride; Amanda Lewis; Dawn Grosvenor; Poornima Rai; Maria Papadopoulos; John Brookes; Catey Bunce; Peng Tee Khaw
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  4 in total

1.  IOP measurement: importance of methodology.

Authors:  Asimina Mataftsi; Paraskevi Malamaki; Nikolaos Kappos
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 2.  Tonometers-which one should I use?

Authors:  Kanza Aziz; David S Friedman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  How should we measure intraocular pressure in the era of coronavirus disease 2019? Balancing infectious risk, cleaning requirements, and accuracy.

Authors:  Christine A Petersen; Andrew Chen; Philip P Chen
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.761

4.  Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.

Authors:  Feng Gao; Xu Liu; Qing Zhao; Yingzhe Pan
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.447

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.