Literature DB >> 17534688

Improving colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice: innovative strategies and future directions.

Carrie N Klabunde1, David Lanier, Erica S Breslau, Jane G Zapka, Robert H Fletcher, David F Ransohoff, Sidney J Winawer.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been supported by strong research evidence and recommended in clinical practice guidelines for more than a decade. Yet screening rates in the United States remain low, especially relative to other preventable diseases such as breast and cervical cancer. To understand the reasons, the National Cancer Institute and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality sponsored a review of CRC screening implementation in primary care and a program of research funded by these organizations. The evidence base for improving CRC screening supports the value of a New Model of Primary Care Delivery: 1. a team approach, in which responsibility for screening tasks is shared among other members of the practice, would help address physicians' lack of time for preventive care; 2. information systems can identify eligible patients and remind them when screening is due; 3. involving patients in decisions about their own care may enhance screening participation; 4. monitoring practice performance, supported by information systems, can help target patients at increased risk because of family history or social disadvantage; 5. reimbursement for services outside the traditional provider-patient encounter, such as telephone and e-mail contacts, may foster enhanced screening delivery; 6. training opportunities in communication, cultural competence, and use of information technologies would improve provider competence in core elements of screening programs. Improvement in CRC screening rates largely depends on the efforts of primary care practices to implement effective systems and procedures for screening delivery. Active engagement and support of practices are essential for the enormous potential of CRC screening to be realized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17534688      PMCID: PMC2305744          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0231-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  65 in total

Review 1.  Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review.

Authors:  S W Vernon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Physician financial incentives and feedback: failure to increase cancer screening in Medicaid managed care.

Authors:  A L Hillman; K Ripley; N Goldfarb; I Nuamah; J Weiner; E Lusk
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The association of attributes of primary care with the delivery of clinical preventive services.

Authors:  S A Flocke; K C Stange; S J Zyzanski
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Increasing cancer screening: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J L Snell; E L Buck
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting.

Authors:  S Shea; W DuMouchel; L Bahamonde
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Illuminating the 'black box'. A description of 4454 patient visits to 138 family physicians.

Authors:  K C Stange; S J Zyzanski; C R Jaén; E J Callahan; R B Kelly; W R Gillanders; J C Shank; J Chao; J H Medalie; W L Miller; B F Crabtree; S A Flocke; V J Gilchrist; D M Langa; M A Goodwin
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Adoption of patient-centered care practices by physicians: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Audet; Karen Davis; Stephen C Schoenbaum
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-10

8.  Barriers to office-based screening sigmoidoscopy: does reimbursement cover costs?

Authors:  J D Lewis; D A Asch
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Effectiveness and patient satisfaction with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy performed by registered nurses.

Authors:  P S Schoenfeld; B Cash; J Kita; M Piorkowski; D Cruess; D Ransohoff
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 10.  Colorectal cancer screening: scientific review.

Authors:  Judith M E Walsh; Jonathan P Terdiman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  66 in total

1.  Impact of remuneration and organizational factors on completing preventive manoeuvres in primary care practices.

Authors:  Simone Dahrouge; William E Hogg; Grant Russell; Meltem Tuna; Robert Geneau; Laura K Muldoon; Elizabeth Kristjansson; John Fletcher
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Evaluation of the use of electronic health data to classify four-year mortality risk for older adults undergoing screening colonoscopies.

Authors:  Marie B Synnestvedt; Mark G Weiner
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

3.  Nursing workforce issues: strategically positioning nurses to facilitate cancer prevention and control.

Authors:  Carol Vreeland Dallred; Joyce E Dains; Gwen Corrigan
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Perception of Colorectal Cancer Risk does not Enhance Participation in Screening.

Authors:  Keith Dear; Leitha Scott; Sharon Chambers; Mike C Corbett; Doug Taupin
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.409

5.  Patient activation increases colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized trial among low-income minority patients.

Authors:  Mira L Katz; James L Fisher; Kelly Fleming; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Screening colonoscopy in the US: attitudes and practices of primary care physicians.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Carrie N Klabunde; Stephen Taplin; Gigi Yuan; David Ransohoff; Sarah Kobrin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas D Sequist; Alan M Zaslavsky; Richard Marshall; Robert H Fletcher; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-23

8.  Colorectal cancer screening in primary care: theoretical model to improve prevalence in the practice partner research network.

Authors:  Lynne S Nemeth; Ruth G Jenkins; Paul J Nietert; Steven M Ornstein
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2009-03-18

9.  Behavioral theory in the context of applied cancer screening research.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Caroline Cranos
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2009-10

10.  Community-based preferences for stool cards versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ann C DeBourcy; Scott Lichtenberger; Susanne Felton; Kiel T Butterfield; Dennis J Ahnen; Thomas D Denberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.