Literature DB >> 21180525

Perception of Colorectal Cancer Risk does not Enhance Participation in Screening.

Keith Dear1, Leitha Scott, Sharon Chambers, Mike C Corbett, Doug Taupin.   

Abstract

High participation is a key requirement for effective cancer screening. Many strategies to improve participation hold that a person's knowledge and beliefs dictate screening behavior. We compared perception of colon cancer risk in participants and nonparticipants in a population-based study of screening colonoscopy, and also assessed past screening behavior. Surprisingly, while past screening behavior was a predictor of participation, we found that participants perceived their risk of colorectal cancer to be significantly and substantially lower than the real figure and that of nonparticipants. Our data suggest that health promotion strategies aimed at improving health knowledge may not be effective in improving population screening rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colonoscopy; colorectal cancer screening; health knowledge/attitudes/practice; mass screening, questionnaires; patient participation/psychology

Year:  2008        PMID: 21180525      PMCID: PMC3002501          DOI: 10.1177/1756283X08097776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1756-283X            Impact factor:   4.409


  26 in total

1.  Going the distance--the case for true colorectal-cancer screening.

Authors:  D K Podolsky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer in average-risk subjects: a community-based pilot project.

Authors:  J K Olynyk; S Aquilia; D R Fletcher; J A Dickinson
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  Cost-effectiveness of screening the average-risk population for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Dawn Provenzale
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2002-01

4.  Colorectal cancer-screening tests and associated health behaviors.

Authors:  J A Shapiro; L C Seeff; M R Nadel
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Feasibility of high-volume screening sigmoidoscopy using a flexible fiberoptic endoscope and a disposable sheath system.

Authors:  P C Schroy; S Wilson; N Afdhal
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Increasing colorectal cancer screening among individuals in the carpentry trade: test of risk communication interventions.

Authors:  Isaac M Lipkus; Celette Sugg Skinner; John Dement; Lisa Pompeii; Barry Moser; Gregory P Samsa; David Ransohoff
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 7.  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.

Authors:  Bernard Levin; David A Lieberman; Beth McFarland; Kimberly S Andrews; Durado Brooks; John Bond; Chiranjeev Dash; Francis M Giardiello; Seth Glick; David Johnson; C Daniel Johnson; Theodore R Levin; Perry J Pickhardt; Douglas K Rex; Robert A Smith; Alan Thorson; Sidney J Winawer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Manipulating perceptions of colorectal cancer threat: implications for screening intentions and behaviors.

Authors:  Isaac M Lipkus; Lasonya G Green; Alfred Marcus
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2003 May-Jun

9.  Changing inaccurate perceptions of health risk: results from a randomized trial.

Authors:  M W Kreuter; V J Strecher
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.267

10.  The science and politics of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Geir Hoff; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  5 in total

1.  No association between colorectal cancer worry and screening uptake in Appalachian Ohio.

Authors:  Adana A Llanos; Michael L Pennell; Gregory S Young; Cathy M Tatum; Mira L Katz; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.341

2.  Changes in risk perceptions in relation to self-reported colorectal cancer screening among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer cases enrolled in a randomized trial.

Authors:  Beth A Glenn; Alison K Herrmann; Catherine M Crespi; Cynthia M Mojica; L Cindy Chang; Annette E Maxwell; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 3.  Does colorectal cancer risk perception predict screening behavior? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas M Atkinson; Talya Salz; Kaitlin K Touza; Yuelin Li; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-08-18

4.  Differences in response to a dietary intervention between the general population and first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Donna McClish; Patrica Carcaise-Edinboro; Hali Esinhart; Diane Baer Wilson; Melanie K Bean
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.045

5.  Self-perceived Mental Health Status and Uptake of Fecal Occult Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Canada: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Celestin Hategekimana; Mohammad Karamouzian
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2016-02-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.