Literature DB >> 12633191

Colorectal cancer screening: scientific review.

Judith M E Walsh1, Jonathan P Terdiman.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Screening for colorectal cancer clearly reduces colorectal cancer mortality, yet many eligible adults remain unscreened. Several screening tests are available, and various professional organizations have differing recommendations on which screening test to use. Clinicians are challenged to ensure that eligible patients undergo colorectal cancer screening and to guide patients in choosing what tests to receive.
OBJECTIVE: To critically assess the evidence for use of the available colorectal cancer screening tests, including fecal occult blood tests, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, double-contrast barium enema, and newer tests, such as virtual colonoscopy and stool-based molecular screening. DATA SOURCES: All relevant English-language articles were identified using PubMed (January 1966-August 2002), published meta-analyses, reference lists of key articles, and expert consultation. DATA EXTRACTION: Studies that evaluated colorectal cancer screening in healthy individuals and assessed clinical outcomes were included. Evidence from randomized controlled trials was considered to be of highest quality, followed by observational evidence. Diagnostic accuracy studies were evaluated when randomized controlled trials and observational studies were not available or did not provide adequate evidence. Studies were excluded if they did not evaluate colorectal screening tests and if they did not evaluate average-risk individuals. DATA SYNTHESIS: Randomized controlled trials have shown that fecal occult blood testing can reduce colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Case-control studies have shown that sigmoidoscopy is associated with a reduction in mortality, and observational studies suggest colonoscopy is effective as well. Combining fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy may decrease mortality and can increase diagnostic yield.
CONCLUSION: The recommendation that all men and women aged 50 years or older undergo screening for colorectal cancer is supported by a large body of direct and indirect evidence. At present, the available evidence does not currently support choosing one test over another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12633191     DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.10.1288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  129 in total

1.  Identification of phospholipid scramblase 1 as a biomarker and determination of its prognostic value for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yung-Bin Kuo; Chung-Chuan Chan; C Allen Chang; Chung-Wei Fan; Ray-Ping Hung; Ya-Shu Hung; Kuei-Tien Chen; Jau-Song Yu; Yu-Sun Chang; Err-Cheng Chan
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 6.354

2.  Effect of tribal language use on colorectal cancer screening among American Indians.

Authors:  Angela A Gonzales; Eva Garroutte; Thanh G N Ton; Jack Goldberg; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2012-12

3.  Screening for colorectal cancer: decisions in general practice.

Authors:  Leonard Leibovici; Abigail Fraser; Sarah Hellmann
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Can suicide in young men be prevented by improving access and delivery among primary care services?

Authors:  André Tylee; Paul Walters
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Interprofessional collaboration and interprofessional education.

Authors:  John Horder
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Analyzing geographic patterns of disease incidence: rates of late-stage colorectal cancer in Iowa.

Authors:  Gerard Rushton; Ika Peleg; Aniruddha Banerjee; Geoffrey Smith; Michele West
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 7.  Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual-level health behavior constructs and screening behavior.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Alyssa Bennett; Marie Zaiter; James R Marshall
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  The Relationship between the Methylated Septin-9 DNA Blood Test and Stool Occult Blood Test for Diagnosing Colorectal Cancer in Taiwanese People.

Authors:  Chung-Hung Chen; Sheng-Lei Yan; Tsung-Hsun Yang; Shih-Feng Chen; Yung-Hsiang Yeh; Jing-Jim Ou; Chien-Hua Lin; Yueh-Tsung Lee; Chien-Hua Chen
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.352

9.  Testing to prevent colon cancer: results from a rural community intervention.

Authors:  John M Westfall; Linda Zittleman; Christin Sutter; Caroline B Emsermann; Elizabeth W Staton; Rebecca Van Vorst; L Miriam Dickinson
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Barriers and facilitators of colon cancer screening among patients at faith-based neighborhood health centers.

Authors:  Melissa Tabbarah; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Mahlon Raymund; Ilene K Jewell; Richard K Zimmerman
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2005-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.