Literature DB >> 10075621

Barriers to office-based screening sigmoidoscopy: does reimbursement cover costs?

J D Lewis1, D A Asch.   

Abstract

Screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy may reduce mortality rates from colorectal cancer. Primary care physicians are able to provide this screening procedure, but many have been reluctant to do so, partly because of the impression that reimbursement rates are inadequate to cover physician costs. This study examines the cost of performing flexible sigmoidoscopy in a primary care practice and compares this cost with the new Medicare reimbursement rate for flexible sigmoidoscopy. Fixed and variable costs associated with the performance of office-based flexible sigmoidoscopy were derived from the published literature. The principal assumption in the analyses is that the time required to perform flexible sigmoidoscopy represents an opportunity cost because the physician could use that time to see additional patients during routine office hours. Sensitivity analyses were done across a range of estimates for the cost variables. When Medicare reimbursement rates were used, the physician's total cost for flexible sigmoidoscopy without biopsy was $86.86, which is similar to the Medicare reimbursement rate for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy (code 45330, $87.84). The calculations were most sensitive to estimates of equipment cost, procedure time, number of procedures performed per year, additional malpractice coverage, and revenue generated per hour of outpatient care. The estimated cost per procedure in a screening program that includes the ability to perform biopsy is $152.93, which exceeds Medicare reimbursement rates across the range of all variables included in the sensitivity analyses. Thus, low reimbursement may limit the adoption of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy with or without biopsy in primary care practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10075621     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  11 in total

1.  Primary care physicians' decisions to perform flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  J D Lewis; D A Asch; G G Ginsberg; T C Hoops; M L Kochman; W B Bilker; B L Strom
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  A game-theoretic framework for estimating a health purchaser's willingness-to-pay for health and for expansion.

Authors:  Reza Yaesoubi; Stephen D Roberts
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2010-08-12

Review 3.  Screening tests for colorectal cancer: a menu of options remains relevant.

Authors:  James E Allison; Michael Lawson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 4.  Colorectal cancer screening 2000: the role of colonoscopy in average-risk individuals.

Authors:  W E Smalley; G M Eisen
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2000-10

5.  An international comparison of cancer survival: metropolitan Toronto, Ontario, and Honolulu, Hawaii.

Authors:  K M Gorey; E J Holowaty; G Fehringer; E Laukkanen; N L Richter; C M Meyer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians: recommendations and practices, 2006-2007.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; David Lanier; Marion R Nadel; Caroline McLeod; Gigi Yuan; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  A cost analysis of colonoscopy using microcosting and time-and-motion techniques.

Authors:  Stephen G Henry; Reid M Ness; Renée A Stiles; Ayumi K Shintani; Robert S Dittus
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Improving colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice: innovative strategies and future directions.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; David Lanier; Erica S Breslau; Jane G Zapka; Robert H Fletcher; David F Ransohoff; Sidney J Winawer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy practice patterns in Ontario: a population-based study.

Authors:  Susan E Schultz; Chris Vinden; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.522

10.  Community contextual predictors of endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in the USA: spatial multilevel regression analysis.

Authors:  Lee R Mobley; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Matthew Urato; Sujha Subramanian
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.