Literature DB >> 9326910

Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review.

S W Vernon1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to evaluate the published literature on adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and sigmoidoscopy. Specifically, the review addresses the following: 1) prevalence of FOBT and sigmoidoscopy; 2) interventions to increase adherence to FOBT and sigmoidoscopy; 3) correlates or predictors of adherence to FOBT and sigmoidoscopy; and 4) reasons for nonadherence. Other objectives are to put the literature on CRC screening adherence in the context of recently reported findings from experimental interventions to change prevention and early detection behaviors and to suggest directions for future research on CRC screening adherence. CRC screening offers the potential both for primary and for secondary prevention. Data from the 1992 National Health Interview Survey show that 26% of the population more than 49 years of age report FOBT within the past 3 years and 33% report ever having had sigmoidoscopy. The Year 2000 goals set forth in Healthy People 2000 are for 50% of the population more than 49 years of age to report FOBT within the past 2 years and for 40% to report that they ever had sigmoidoscopy. Thus, systematic efforts to increase CRC screening are warranted. To date, attempts to promote CRC screening have used both a public health model that targets entire communities, e.g., mass media campaigns, and a medical model that targets individuals, e.g., general practice patients. Most of these efforts, however, did not include systematic evaluation of strategies to increase adherence. The data on FOBT show that the median adherence rate to programmatic offers of FOBT is between 40% and 50%, depending on the type of population offered the test, e.g., patients or employees. Approximately, 50% of those initially offered testing in unselected populations will respond to minimal prompts or interventions. A salient issue for FOBT, however, is whether or not the behavior can be sustained over time. Fewer studies examined adherence to sigmoidoscopy. Adherence was highest in relatives of CRC cases and in employer-sponsored programs offered to workers at increased risk of CRC. At present, we know very little about the determinants of CRC screening behaviors, particularly as they relate to rescreening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9326910     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/89.19.1406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  218 in total

1.  Protective effect of faecal occult blood test screening for colorectal cancer: worse prognosis for screening refusers.

Authors:  Y Niv; M Lev-El; G Fraser; G Abuksis; A Tamir
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Psychosocial risk profiles among black male Veterans Administration patients non-adherent with colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Rhonda BeLue; Usha Menon; Anita Y Kinney; Laura A Szalacha
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Evaluating the impact of an educational intervention to increase CRC screening rates in the African American community: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Errol J Philip; Katherine DuHamel; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  A randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive computer-delivered intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: sometimes more is just the same.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Leona K Bartholomew; Amy McQueen; Judy L Bettencourt; Anthony Greisinger; Sharon P Coan; David Lairson; Wenyaw Chan; S T Hawley; R E Myers
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-06

5.  Effect of tribal language use on colorectal cancer screening among American Indians.

Authors:  Angela A Gonzales; Eva Garroutte; Thanh G N Ton; Jack Goldberg; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2012-12

Review 6.  Virtual magnetic resonance colonography.

Authors:  J F Debatin; T C Lauenstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Barriers to colorectal cancer screening with fecal occult blood testing in a predominantly minority urban population: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Corey H Brouse; Charles E Basch; Randi L Wolf; Celia Shmukler; Alfred I Neugut; Steven Shea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 8.  Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: an integrative review.

Authors:  Susan M Rawl; Usha Menon; Allison Burness; Erica S Breslau
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.250

9.  Factors associated with participation in colorectal cancer screening in Korea: the Fourth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IV).

Authors:  Jun-Pyo Myong; Jin-Yong Shin; Su-Jin Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Performance of the fecal immunochemical test is not decreased by high ambient temperature in the rapid return system.

Authors:  Jae Myung Cha; Joung Il Lee; Kwang Ro Joo; Hyun Phil Shin; Jae Jun Park; Jung Won Jeun; Jun Uk Lim; Sang-Hyun Hwang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.