Literature DB >> 24838269

Acoustic masking disrupts time-dependent mechanisms of memory encoding in word-list recall.

Katheryn A Q Cousins1, Hayim Dar, Arthur Wingfield, Paul Miller.   

Abstract

Recall of recently heard words is affected by the clarity of presentation: Even if all words are presented with sufficient clarity for successful recognition, those that are more difficult to hear are less likely to be recalled. Such a result demonstrates that memory processing depends on more than whether a word is simply "recognized" versus "not recognized." More surprising is that, when a single item in a list of spoken words is acoustically masked, prior words that were heard with full clarity are also less likely to be recalled. To account for such a phenomenon, we developed the linking-by-active-maintenance model (LAMM). This computational model of perception and encoding predicts that these effects will be time dependent. Here we challenged our model by investigating whether and how the impact of acoustic masking on memory depends on presentation rate. We found that a slower presentation rate causes a more disruptive impact of stimulus degradation on prior, clearly heard words than does a fast rate. These results are unexpected according to prior theories of effortful listening, but we demonstrated that they can be accounted for by LAMM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24838269      PMCID: PMC4030694          DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0377-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  72 in total

1.  Comparing the effects of aging and background noise on short-term memory performance.

Authors:  Dana R Murphy; Fergus I M Craik; Karen Z H Li; Bruce A Schneider
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2000-06

2.  Probabilistic decision making by slow reverberation in cortical circuits.

Authors:  Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-12-05       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  The effects of hearing loss and age on the benefit of spatial separation between multiple talkers in reverberant rooms.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Short-term memory after all: comment on Sederberg, Howard, and Kahana (2008).

Authors:  Marius Usher; Eddy J Davelaar; Henk J Haarmann; Yonatan Goshen-Gottstein
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Distractibility during episodic retrieval is exacerbated by perturbation of left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Peter E Wais; Olivia Y Kim; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  A buffer model of memory encoding and temporal correlations in retrieval.

Authors:  Melissa Lehman; Kenneth J Malmberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Unit activity in prefrontal cortex during delayed-response performance: neuronal correlates of transient memory.

Authors:  J M Fuster
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Channel-capacity, intelligibility and immediate memory.

Authors:  P M Rabbitt
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Mnemonic coding of visual space in the monkey's dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  S Funahashi; C J Bruce; P S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Encoding processes and memory organization: a model of the von Restorff effect.

Authors:  M Fabiani; E Donchin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  16 in total

1.  Variations Within Normal Hearing Acuity and Speech Comprehension: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Nicole D Ayasse; Lana R Penn; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  Effects of Age, Acoustic Challenge, and Verbal Working Memory on Recall of Narrative Speech.

Authors:  Caitlin M Ward; Chad S Rogers; Kristin J Van Engen; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

3.  Pupillometry reveals cognitive demands of lexical competition during spoken word recognition in young and older adults.

Authors:  Drew J McLaughlin; Maggie E Zink; Lauren Gaunt; Kristin J Van Engen; Mitchell S Sommers; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-08-17

4.  Prefrontal cortex supports speech perception in listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Arefeh Sherafati; Noel Dwyer; Aahana Bajracharya; Mahlega Samira Hassanpour; Adam T Eggebrecht; Jill B Firszt; Joseph P Culver; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 5.  The Neural Consequences of Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  The Impact of Age, Background Noise, Semantic Ambiguity, and Hearing Loss on Recognition Memory for Spoken Sentences.

Authors:  Margaret A Koeritzer; Chad S Rogers; Kristin J Van Engen; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Recall of Speech is Impaired by Subsequent Masking Noise: A Replication of Experiment 2.

Authors:  Claire Guang; Emmett Lefkowitz; Naseem Dillman-Hasso; Violet A Brown; Julia F Strand
Journal:  Audit Percept Cogn       Date:  2021-03-15

8.  The effects of hearing loss on neural processing and plasticity.

Authors:  Arthur Wingfield; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-06

9.  Listening effort and accented speech.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Methodological challenges and solutions in auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.