Literature DB >> 17530448

Patient-reported outcomes measurement and management with innovative methodologies and technologies.

Chih-Hung Chang1.   

Abstract

Successful integration of modern psychometrics and advanced informatics in patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measurement and management can potentially maximize the value of health outcomes research and optimize the delivery of quality patient care. Unlike the traditional labor-intensive paper-and-pencil data collection method, item response theory-based computerized adaptive testing methodologies coupled with novel technologies provide an integrated environment to collect, analyze and present ready-to-use PRO data for informed and shared decision-making. This article describes the needs, challenges and solutions for accurate, efficient and cost-effective PRO data acquisition and dissemination means in order to provide critical and timely PRO information necessary to actively support and enhance routine patient care in busy clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17530448     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-007-9196-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  40 in total

1.  Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: a brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales.

Authors:  J E Ware; J B Bjorner; M Kosinski
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Instrument translation process: a methods review.

Authors:  Wantana Maneesriwongul; Jane K Dixon
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 3.  The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) privacy rule: implications for clinical research.

Authors:  Rachel Nosowsky; Thomas J Giordano
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.739

4.  The FDA and the person with cancer: give PROs a chance.

Authors:  David Cella
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.990

5.  The use of quality of life data in clinical practice.

Authors:  J Morris; D Perez; B McNoe
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Physicians' perspective on quality of life: an exploratory study of oncologists.

Authors:  K M Taylor; K G Macdonald; A Bezjak; P Ng; A D DePetrillo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Feasibility of monitoring patient based health outcomes in a routine hospital setting.

Authors:  D Ruta; A Coutts; M Abdalla; J Masson; E Russell; P Brunt; A McKinlay; A Mowat; T Sinclair
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-09

8.  Outcomes: essential information for clinical decision support: an interview with Ellen B. White. Interview by Melinda L. Orlando.

Authors:  E B White
Journal:  J Health Care Finance       Date:  1998

9.  Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors.

Authors:  Ross Koppel; Joshua P Metlay; Abigail Cohen; Brian Abaluck; A Russell Localio; Stephen E Kimmel; Brian L Strom
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Improving patient quality of life with feedback to physicians about functional status.

Authors:  L V Rubenstein; J M McCoy; D W Cope; P A Barrett; S H Hirsch; K S Messer; R T Young
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  27 in total

1.  Content-balancing strategy in bifactor computerized adaptive patient-reported outcome measurement.

Authors:  Yi Zheng; Chih-Hung Chang; Hua-Hua Chang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Using Qualitative Research to Inform the Development of a Comprehensive Outcomes Assessment for Asthma.

Authors:  Diane M Turner-Bowker; Renee N Saris-Baglama; Michael A Derosa; Christine A Paulsen; Christopher P Bransfield
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Using qualitative research to inform the development of a comprehensive outcomes assessment for asthma.

Authors:  Diane M Turner-Bowker; Renee N Saris-Baglama; Michael A Derosa; Christine A Paulsen; Christopher P Bransfield
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Spinal cord injury-functional index: item banks to measure physical functioning in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  David S Tulsky; Alan M Jette; Pamela A Kisala; Claire Kalpakjian; Marcel P Dijkers; Gale Whiteneck; Pengsheng Ni; Steven Kirshblum; Susan Charlifue; Allen W Heinemann; Martin Forchheimer; Mary D Slavin; Bethlyn Houlihan; Denise G Tate; Trevor Dyson-Hudson; Denise G Fyffe; Steve Williams; Jeanne Zanca
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Implementation of a mobile inpatient quality of life (QoL) assessment for oncology nursing.

Authors:  Markus K Schuler; Freya Trautmann; Mirko Radloff; Roman Schmädig; Leopold Hentschel; Maria Eberlein-Gonska; Thomas Petzold; Heike Vetter; Sebastian Oberlack; Gerhard Ehninger; Jochen Schmitt
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  [Patient reported outcome monitoring using a tablet PC is suitable for measuring quality of life in patients with gliomas].

Authors:  Bernhard Holzner; Gabriele Schauer-Maurer; Guenter Stockhammer; Armin Muigg; Markus Hutterer; Johannes Giesinger
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-01

7.  Psychometric validation of PROMIS® Anxiety and Depression Item Banks for the Brazilian population.

Authors:  Natália Fontes Caputo de Castro; Rogério de Melo Costa Pinto; Tânia Maria da Silva Mendonça; Carlos Henrique Martins da Silva
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Technology and quality of life outcomes.

Authors:  Eileen Danaher Hacker
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.315

9.  The development of a clinical outcomes survey research application: Assessment Center.

Authors:  Richard Gershon; Nan E Rothrock; Rachel T Hanrahan; Liz J Jansky; Mark Harniss; William Riley
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Use of SMS and tablet computer improves the electronic collection of elective orthopaedic patient reported outcome measures.

Authors:  N Roberts; B Bradley; D Williams
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.