Literature DB >> 26984243

Implementation of a mobile inpatient quality of life (QoL) assessment for oncology nursing.

Markus K Schuler1, Freya Trautmann2,3, Mirko Radloff1, Roman Schmädig1, Leopold Hentschel4, Maria Eberlein-Gonska5, Thomas Petzold2,5, Heike Vetter6, Sebastian Oberlack6, Gerhard Ehninger1, Jochen Schmitt2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cancer patients suffer from a variety of symptoms, but little is known about changes during hospitalization and symptom burden at discharge. We implemented an electronic quality of life (QoL) assessment used by the nursing team in routine inpatient care. Feasibility, acceptance, and the course of QoL were investigated.
METHODS: A self-administered electronic questionnaire based on the EQ-5D and the EORTC QLQ-C30 was applied in clinical routine. Cancer patients were approached by the nursing staff to complete the QoL assessment twice, at admission and at the day of discharge. Both the feedback of the nursing staff as well as characteristics of participants were used to evaluate the electronic assessment.
RESULTS: Out of 210 patients from an oncologic ward, 85 patients (40 %) were invited to participate, 95 % of whom (n = 81) agreed to participate. Participation rate depended on the day of admission, the presence of the coordinating nurse, the overall morbidity assessed by patient clinical complexity level, and the patient age. Forty-six patients (56 %) asked for assistance in completing the questionnaire. Patients older than 53 years and male patients were more likely to need assistance. Twenty-two percent of the nursing staff (n = 5) use the information assessed for individual patient care. Fifty-two percent (n = 12) rated the additional workload as very little or little and 68 % (n = 15) agreed that handling for the patient was easy. Global QoL improved during the stay. Most severe symptoms at admission included fatigue, pain, appetite loss, and insomnia.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that it is feasible to implement and use an electronic QoL assessment by the nursing staff in routine inpatient cancer care. Obstacles and worries of staff members have to be considered when further developing this program.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic assessment; Oncology nursing; Patient care; Quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26984243     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3163-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  39 in total

Review 1.  EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group.

Authors:  R Rabin; F de Charro
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.709

2.  Evidence-based guidelines for interpreting change scores for the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30.

Authors:  K Cocks; M T King; G Velikova; G de Castro; M Martyn St-James; P M Fayers; J M Brown
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 3.  Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers.

Authors:  Bárbara Antunes; Richard Harding; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 4.762

4.  Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Symone B Detmar; Martin J Muller; Jan H Schornagel; Lidwina D V Wever; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Carol DeSantis; Katherine Virgo; Kevin Stein; Angela Mariotto; Tenbroeck Smith; Dexter Cooper; Ted Gansler; Catherine Lerro; Stacey Fedewa; Chunchieh Lin; Corinne Leach; Rachel Spillers Cannady; Hyunsoon Cho; Steve Scoppa; Mark Hachey; Rebecca Kirch; Ahmedin Jemal; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Patient self-reports of symptoms and clinician ratings as predictors of overall cancer survival.

Authors:  Chantal Quinten; John Maringwa; Carolyn C Gotay; Francesca Martinelli; Corneel Coens; Bryce B Reeve; Henning Flechtner; Eva Greimel; Madeleine King; David Osoba; Charles Cleeland; Jolie Ringash; Joseph Schmucker-Von Koch; Martin J B Taphoorn; Joachim Weis; Andrew Bottomley
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Quality of life and symptoms in patients with malignant diseases admitted to a comprehensive cancer centre.

Authors:  Annette Sand Strömgren; Carsten Utoft Niemann; Ulla Brix Tange; Hanne Farholt; Nan M Sonne; Lena Ankersen; Lisbet Kristensen; Lisbeth Bendixen; Mogens Groenvold; Morten Aagaard Petersen; Mie Nordly; Lona Christrup; Per Sjøgren; Geana Paula Kurita
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Baseline quality of life as a prognostic indicator of survival: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from EORTC clinical trials.

Authors:  Chantal Quinten; Corneel Coens; Murielle Mauer; Sylvie Comte; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Charles Cleeland; David Osoba; Kristin Bjordal; Andrew Bottomley
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Patient-reported quality of supportive care among patients with colorectal cancer in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

Authors:  Michelle van Ryn; Sean M Phelan; Neeraj K Arora; David A Haggstrom; George L Jackson; S Yousuf Zafar; Joan M Griffin; Leah L Zullig; Dawn Provenzale; Mark W Yeazel; Rahul M Jindal; Steven B Clauser
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Galina Velikova; Laura Booth; Adam B Smith; Paul M Brown; Pamela Lynch; Julia M Brown; Peter J Selby
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  3 in total

1.  Feasibility of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment for cancer patients using electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) in daily clinical practice.

Authors:  Guillaume Mouillet; Antoine Falcoz; Joëlle Fritzsch; Hamadi Almotlak; Pascale Jacoulet; Xavier Pivot; Cristian Villanueva; Laura Mansi; Stefano Kim; Elsa Curtit; Nathalie Meneveau; Olivier Adotevi; Marine Jary; Guillaume Eberst; Angelique Vienot; Fabien Calcagno; Astrid Pozet; Oumelkheir Djoumakh; Christophe Borg; Virginie Westeel; Amélie Anota; Sophie Paget-Bailly
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Cancer patients' control preferences in decision making and associations with patient-reported outcomes: a prospective study in an outpatient cancer center.

Authors:  Markus Schuler; Jan Schildmann; Freya Trautmann; Leopold Hentschel; Beate Hornemann; Anke Rentsch; Gerhard Ehninger; Jochen Schmitt
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Quality of life and added value of a tailored palliative care intervention in patients with soft tissue sarcoma undergoing treatment with trabectedin: a multicentre, cluster-randomised trial within the German Interdisciplinary Sarcoma Group (GISG).

Authors:  Leopold Hentschel; Stephan Richter; Hans-Georg Kopp; Bernd Kasper; Annegret Kunitz; Viktor Grünwald; Torsten Kessler; Jens Marcus Chemnitz; Uwe Pelzer; Ulrich Schuler; Janet Freitag; Andrea Schilling; Beate Hornemann; Karin Arndt; Martin Bornhäuser; Markus Kajo Schuler
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.