Literature DB >> 20152578

Technology and quality of life outcomes.

Eileen Danaher Hacker1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To discuss recent technological advances in quality of life (QOL) data collection and guidance for use in research and clinical practice. The use of telephone-, computer-, and web/internet-based technologies to collect QOL data, reliability and validity issues, and cost will be discussed, along with the potential pitfalls associated with these technologies. DATA SOURCES: Health care literature and web resources.
CONCLUSION: Technology has provided researchers and clinicians with an opportunity to collect QOL data from patients that were previously not accessible. Most technologies offer a variety of options, such as language choice, formatting options for the delivery of questions, and data management services. Choosing the appropriate technology for use in research and/or clinical practice primarily depends on the purpose for QOL data collection. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Technology is changing the way nurses assess QOL in patients with cancer and provide care. As stakeholders in the health care delivery system and patient advocates, nurses must be intimately involved in the evaluation and use of new technologies that impact QOL and/or the delivery of care. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20152578      PMCID: PMC2853361          DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2009.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs        ISSN: 0749-2081            Impact factor:   2.315


  51 in total

1.  Conceptual model of health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Carol Estwing Ferrans; Julie Johnson Zerwic; Jo Ellen Wilbur; Janet L Larson
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.176

2.  Why are head and neck cancer clinicians not measuring quality of life?

Authors:  H M Mehanna; R P Morton
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 1.469

3.  A feasibility study of computer-assisted health-related quality of life data collection in patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  L Millsopp; S Frackleton; D Lowe; S N Rogers
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  Pilot of a novel cervical screening intervention: interactive voice response.

Authors:  Ross Corkrey; Lynne Parkinson; Lucy Bates; Sue Green; Aye Thidar Htun
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.939

5.  Development, feasibility and compliance of a web-based system for very frequent QOL and symptom home self-assessment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  N Bush; G Donaldson; C Moinpour; M Haberman; D Milliken; V Markle; J Lauson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Fatigue and physical activity in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Authors:  Eileen Hacker Danaher; Carol Ferrans; Ellen Verlen; Farhad Ravandi; Koen van Besien; Julie Gelms; Natalie Dieterle
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Pressing the key pad: trial of a novel approach to health promotion advice.

Authors:  Ross Corkrey; Lynne Parkinson; Lucy Bates
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Ecological momentary assessment of fatigue in patients receiving intensive cancer therapy.

Authors:  Eileen Danaher Hacker; Carol Estwing Ferrans
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  Feasibility of collecting diary data from asthma patients through mobile phones and SMS (short message service): response rate analysis and focus group evaluation from a pilot study.

Authors:  Jacob Anhøj; Claus Møldrup
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Effect of method of administration on longitudinal assessment of quality of life in gynecologic cancer: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Karen M Gil; Heidi E Frasure; Michael P Hopkins; Eric L Jenison; Vivian E von Gruenigen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-01-17       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A review of quality of life (QOL) assessments and indicators: Towards a "QOL-Climate" assessment framework.

Authors:  Ronald C Estoque; Takuya Togawa; Makoto Ooba; Kei Gomi; Shogo Nakamura; Yasuaki Hijioka; Yasuko Kameyama
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  A comparison of cancer survivors from the PROMIS study selecting telephone versus online questionnaires.

Authors:  Megan Scull Williams; Denise C Snyder; Richard Sloane; Justin Levens; Kathryn E Flynn; Carrie B Dombeck; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Kevin P Weinfurt
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.894

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.