Literature DB >> 24992417

Use of SMS and tablet computer improves the electronic collection of elective orthopaedic patient reported outcome measures.

N Roberts1, B Bradley, D Williams.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Electronic patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) enable real time reporting back to the patient and medical team, comparison between similar patient cohorts and long-term cost effective outcome measurement. The primary objective of this three-phase pilot study was to measure uptake using a web-based PROM system following the introduction of two separate process improvements.
METHODS: Eighty consecutive new elective orthopaedic patients in a single surgeon's practice were recruited for the study. Patients in Group 1 (n=26) received only a letter reminding them to complete a symptom score. Those in Group 2 (n=31) also received a reminder SMS (short message service) message via their mobile or home telephone and those in Group 3 (n=23) also had access to a tablet computer in clinic.
RESULTS: The mean patient age in Group 1 was 55 years (range: 24-80 years), in Group 2 it was 60 years (range: 23-85 years) and in Group 3 it was 58 years (range: 37-78 years) (p>0.05). Overall, 79% of patients had internet access, and 35% of Group 1, 55% of Group 2 and 74% of Group 3 recorded an electronic PROM score (p=0.02). In Group 3, 94% of patients listed for an operation completed an electronic PROM score (p=0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: Collecting PROM data effectively in everyday clinical practice is challenging. Electronic collection should meet that challenge and improve healthcare delivery but it is in its infancy. This pilot study shows that the combination of an SMS reminder and access to a Wi-Fi enabled tablet computer in the clinic setting enabled 94% of patients listed for an operation to complete a score on a web-based clinical outcomes system. Additional staff training and telephone call reminders may further improve uptake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24992417      PMCID: PMC4473930          DOI: 10.1308/003588414X13946184900769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  15 in total

1.  Evaluation of a new short generic measure of health status: howRu.

Authors:  Tim Benson; Steve Sizmur; Justin Whatling; Seref Arikan; Dianna McDonald; David Ingram
Journal:  Inform Prim Care       Date:  2010

2.  Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement.

Authors:  J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; D Murray; A Carr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-01

3.  Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement.

Authors:  J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; A Carr; D Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-03

4.  Let the patient revolution begin.

Authors:  Tessa Richards; Victor M Montori; Fiona Godlee; Peter Lapsley; Dave Paul
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-05-14

Review 5.  Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review.

Authors:  Susan Marshall; Kirstie Haywood; Ray Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.

Authors:  Stephen Joel Coons; Chad J Gwaltney; Ron D Hays; J Jason Lundy; Jeff A Sloan; Dennis A Revicki; William R Lenderking; David Cella; Ethan Basch
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 5.725

7.  Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare.

Authors:  Nick Black
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-01-28

8.  Patient-reported outcomes measurement and management with innovative methodologies and technologies.

Authors:  Chih-Hung Chang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-05-26       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Self-assessments of patients via Tablet PC in routine patient care: comparison with standardised paper questionnaires.

Authors:  J G Richter; A Becker; T Koch; M Nixdorf; R Willers; R Monser; B Schacher; R Alten; C Specker; M Schneider
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  The Computer-based Health Evaluation Software (CHES): a software for electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring.

Authors:  Bernhard Holzner; Johannes M Giesinger; Jakob Pinggera; Stefan Zugal; Felix Schöpf; Anne S Oberguggenberger; Eva M Gamper; August Zabernigg; Barbara Weber; Gerhard Rumpold
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  9 in total

1.  Socioeconomic deprivation and age are barriers to the online collection of patient reported outcome measures in orthopaedic patients.

Authors:  P J Jenkins; S Sng; K Brooksbank; A J Brooksbank
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Perioperative Smartphone Apps and Devices for Patient-Centered Care.

Authors:  Allan F Simpao; Arul M Lingappan; Luis M Ahumada; Mohamed A Rehman; Jorge A Gálvez
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  The variability in Oxford hip and knee scores in the preoperative period: is there an ideal time to score?

Authors:  C Quah; D Holmes; T Khan; S Cockshott; J Lewis; A Stephen
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Electronic capture of patient-reported and clinician-reported outcome measures in an elective orthopaedic setting: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Karan Malhotra; Olatunbosun Buraimoh; James Thornton; Nicholas Cullen; Dishan Singh; Andrew J Goldberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Male Sex, Decreased Activity Level, and Higher BMI Associated With Lower Completion of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Eric J Cotter; Charles P Hannon; Philip Locker; Annabelle Davey; Kevin C Wang; Nikhil N Verma; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-03-07

6.  Cost-Effective Mobile-Based Healthcare System for Managing Total Joint Arthroplasty Follow-Up.

Authors:  Marina Bitsaki; George Koutras; Hansjoerg Heep; Christos Koutras
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2017-01-31

7.  A real-time electronic symptom monitoring system for patients after discharge following surgery: a pilot study in cancer-related surgery.

Authors:  H S Richards; J M Blazeby; A Portal; R Harding; T Reed; T Lander; K A Chalmers; R Carter; R Singhal; K Absolom; G Velikova; K N L Avery
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Using Text Messaging in Long-Term Arthroplasty Follow-Up: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Oliver Blocker; Alison Bullock; Rhidian Morgan-Jones; Adel Ghandour; James Richardson
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-05-16

9.  Preoperative psychometric properties of visual analog scale asessments for function, pain, and strength compared with legacy upper extremity outcome measures in glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Alexander Beletsky; Yining Lu; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Evan Polce; Bhargavi Maheshwer; Jorge Chahla; Brian Forsythe; Brian J Cole; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-06-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.