Literature DB >> 15755942

Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors.

Ross Koppel1, Joshua P Metlay, Abigail Cohen, Brian Abaluck, A Russell Localio, Stephen E Kimmel, Brian L Strom.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Hospital computerized physician order entry (CPOE) systems are widely regarded as the technical solution to medication ordering errors, the largest identified source of preventable hospital medical error. Published studies report that CPOE reduces medication errors up to 81%. Few researchers, however, have focused on the existence or types of medication errors facilitated by CPOE.
OBJECTIVE: To identify and quantify the role of CPOE in facilitating prescription error risks. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a qualitative and quantitative study of house staff interaction with a CPOE system at a tertiary-care teaching hospital (2002-2004). We surveyed house staff (N = 261; 88% of CPOE users); conducted 5 focus groups and 32 intensive one-on-one interviews with house staff, information technology leaders, pharmacy leaders, attending physicians, and nurses; shadowed house staff and nurses; and observed them using CPOE. Participants included house staff, nurses, and hospital leaders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Examples of medication errors caused or exacerbated by the CPOE system.
RESULTS: We found that a widely used CPOE system facilitated 22 types of medication error risks. Examples include fragmented CPOE displays that prevent a coherent view of patients' medications, pharmacy inventory displays mistaken for dosage guidelines, ignored antibiotic renewal notices placed on paper charts rather than in the CPOE system, separation of functions that facilitate double dosing and incompatible orders, and inflexible ordering formats generating wrong orders. Three quarters of the house staff reported observing each of these error risks, indicating that they occur weekly or more often. Use of multiple qualitative and survey methods identified and quantified error risks not previously considered, offering many opportunities for error reduction.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that a leading CPOE system often facilitated medication error risks, with many reported to occur frequently. As CPOE systems are implemented, clinicians and hospitals must attend to errors that these systems cause in addition to errors that they prevent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15755942     DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  487 in total

1.  Pharmacists' interventions in prescribing errors at hospital discharge: an observational study in the context of an electronic prescribing system in a UK teaching hospital.

Authors:  Derar H Abdel-Qader; Lindsay Harper; Judith A Cantrill; Mary P Tully
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  The Peltzman effect and compensatory markers in medicine.

Authors:  Vinay Prasad; Anupam B Jena
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2014-09-01

3.  Detecting pregnancy use of non-hormonal category X medications in electronic medical records.

Authors:  Brian L Strom; Rita Schinnar; Joshua Jones; Warren B Bilker; Mark G Weiner; Sean Hennessy; Charles E Leonard; Peter F Cronholm; Eric Pifer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Systematic refinement of a health information technology time and motion workflow instrument for inpatient nursing care using a standardized interface terminology.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Karen A Monsen; Terrence J Adam; David S Pieczkiewicz; Megan Daman; Genevieve B Melton
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

5.  Are physicians' perceptions of healthcare quality and practice satisfaction affected by errors associated with electronic health record use?

Authors:  Jennifer S Love; Adam Wright; Steven R Simon; Chelsea A Jenter; Christine S Soran; Lynn A Volk; David W Bates; Eric G Poon
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Development of a clinician reputation metric to identify appropriate problem-medication pairs in a crowdsourced knowledge base.

Authors:  Allison B McCoy; Adam Wright; Deevakar Rogith; Safa Fathiamini; Allison J Ottenbacher; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 6.317

7.  Are three methods better than one? A comparative assessment of usability evaluation methods in an EHR.

Authors:  Muhammad F Walji; Elsbeth Kalenderian; Mark Piotrowski; Duong Tran; Krishna K Kookal; Oluwabunmi Tokede; Joel M White; Ram Vaderhobli; Rachel Ramoni; Paul C Stark; Nicole S Kimmes; Maxim Lagerweij; Vimla L Patel
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 4.046

8.  Effects of training physicians in electronic prescribing in the outpatient setting on clinical, learning and behavioural outcomes: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  F van Stiphout; J E F Zwart-van Rijkom; J Versmissen; H Koffijberg; J E C M Aarts; I H van der Sijs; T van Gelder; R A de Man; C B Roes; A C G Egberts; E W M T Ter Braak
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Using an Evidence-Based Approach to EMR Implementation to Optimize Outcomes and Avoid Unintended Consequences.

Authors:  Christopher A Longhurst; Jonathan P Palma; Lisa M Grisim; Eric Widen; Melanie Chan; Paul J Sharek
Journal:  J Healthc Inf Manag       Date:  2013

10.  Mixed methods in biomedical and health services research.

Authors:  Leslie A Curry; Harlan M Krumholz; Alicia O'Cathain; Vicki L Plano Clark; Emily Cherlin; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2013-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.