Literature DB >> 17524479

In vitro, in vivo and post explantation testing of glucose-detecting biosensors: current methods and recommendations.

Heidi E Koschwanez1, William M Reichert.   

Abstract

To date, there have been a number of cases where glucose sensors have performed well over long periods of implantation; however, it remains difficult to predict whether a given sensor will perform reliably, will exhibit gradual degradation of performance, or will fail outright soon after implantation. Typically, the literature emphasizes the sensor that performed well, while only briefly (if at all) mentioning the failed devices. This leaves open the question of whether current sensor designs are adequate for the hostile in vivo environment, and whether these sensors have been assessed by the proper regimen of testing protocols. This paper reviews the current in vitro and in vivo testing procedures used to evaluate the functionality and biocompatibility of implantable glucose sensors. An overview of the standards and regulatory bodies that govern biomaterials and end product device testing precedes a discussion of up-to-date invasive and non-invasive technologies for diabetes management. Analysis of current in vitro, in vivo, and then post explantation testing is presented. Given the underlying assumption that the success of the sensor in vitro foreshadows the long-term reliability of the sensor in the human body, the relative merits of these testing methods are evaluated with respect to how representative they are of human models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17524479      PMCID: PMC1987311          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  82 in total

Review 1.  Characterization of implantable biosensor membrane biofouling.

Authors:  N Wisniewski; F Moussy; W M Reichert
Journal:  Fresenius J Anal Chem       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr

Review 2.  Performance of subcutaneously implanted glucose sensors for continuous monitoring.

Authors:  M Gerritsen; J A Jansen; J A Lutterman
Journal:  Neth J Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.422

3.  Legal requirements for the preclinical toxicological evaluation of biomaterials.

Authors:  J Leuschner
Journal:  Clin Mater       Date:  1992

4.  Evaluating in vitro and in vivo the interference of ascorbate and acetaminophen on glucose detection by a needle-type glucose sensor.

Authors:  D Moatti-Sirat; G Velho; G Reach
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 10.618

5.  Saphenous vein puncture for blood sampling of the mouse, rat, hamster, gerbil, guinea pig, ferret and mink.

Authors:  A Hem; A J Smith; P Solberg
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.471

6.  Engineering the tissue which encapsulates subcutaneous implants. III. Effective tissue response times.

Authors:  A A Sharkawy; B Klitzman; G A Truskey; W M Reichert
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1998-06-15

7.  Transient response of the two-dimensional glucose sensor.

Authors:  J Y Lucisano; D A Gough
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1988-07-01       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Biocompatibility test procedures for materials evaluation in vitro. II. Objective methods of toxicity assessment.

Authors:  H J Johnson; S J Northup; P A Seagraves; M Atallah; P J Garvin; L Lin; T D Darby
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1985 May-Jun

9.  Ex ova chick chorioallantoic membrane as a novel in vivo model for testing biosensors.

Authors:  T I Valdes; U Klueh; D Kreutzer; F Moussy
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  Responses and calibration of amperometric glucose sensors implanted in the subcutaneous tissue of man.

Authors:  J C Pickup; D J Claremont; G W Shaw
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.280

View more
  39 in total

1.  Toward an injectable continuous osmotic glucose sensor.

Authors:  Erik Johannessen; Olga Krushinitskaya; Andrey Sokolov; Häfliger Philipp; Arno Hoogerwerf; Christian Hinderling; Kari Kautio; Jaakko Lenkkeri; Esko Strömmer; Vasily Kondratyev; Tor Inge Tønnessen; Tom Eirik Mollnes; Henrik Jakobsen; Even Zimmer; Bengt Akselsen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-07-01

2.  Characterization of porous, dexamethasone-releasing polyurethane coatings for glucose sensors.

Authors:  Suzana G Vallejo-Heligon; Bruce Klitzman; William M Reichert
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 3.  Biomaterials/tissue interactions: possible solutions to overcome foreign body response.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Morais; Fotios Papadimitrakopoulos; Diane J Burgess
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 4.  Biomechanics of the sensor-tissue interface-effects of motion, pressure, and design on sensor performance and the foreign body response-part I: theoretical framework.

Authors:  Kristen L Helton; Buddy D Ratner; Natalie A Wisniewski
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

5.  A review of the biocompatibility of implantable devices: current challenges to overcome foreign body response.

Authors:  Yoshinori Onuki; Upkar Bhardwaj; Fotios Papadimitrakopoulos; Diane J Burgess
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11

6.  Microsphere erosion in outer hydrogel membranes creating macroscopic porosity to counter biofouling-induced sensor degradation.

Authors:  S Vaddiraju; Y Wang; L Qiang; D J Burgess; F Papadimitrakopoulos
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 7.  Biocompatible materials for continuous glucose monitoring devices.

Authors:  Scott P Nichols; Ahyeon Koh; Wesley L Storm; Jae Ho Shin; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  In vitro and in vivo characterization of porous poly-L-lactic acid coatings for subcutaneously implanted glucose sensors.

Authors:  H E Koschwanez; F Y Yap; B Klitzman; W M Reichert
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 4.396

9.  GlucoMen Day continuous glucose monitoring system: a screening for enzymatic and electrochemical interferents.

Authors:  Fausto Lucarelli; Francesco Ricci; Felice Caprio; Francesco Valgimigli; Cosimo Scuffi; Danila Moscone; Giuseppe Palleschi
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-01

Review 10.  Biomimetic strategies based on viruses and bacteria for the development of immune evasive biomaterials.

Authors:  Matthew T Novak; James D Bryers; William M Reichert
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.