Literature DB >> 14517879

Ex ova chick chorioallantoic membrane as a novel in vivo model for testing biosensors.

T I Valdes1, U Klueh, D Kreutzer, F Moussy.   

Abstract

A major problem with implantable sensors is their short in vivo lifetime, due to strong tissue reactions (i.e., inflammation and fibrosis) caused by the implant and the failure of sensor components. The tissue reactions to the sensor, the biocompatibility of components, and the function of the sensor must be evaluated by using in vivo models. Current methods of in vivo biosensor testing are time- and labor- intensive and expensive. In addition, the results often vary on the basis of the surgical skills of the investigator. The in ova chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of the developing chicken embryo was previously developed in our laboratory as a novel in vivo system to test biomaterials. In this new article, we describe a novel approach for testing biosensors in vivo using the ex ova CAM model as an alternative to the traditional mammalian models. Fertilized chicken eggs were incubated for 3 days in ova and then transferred into a petri dish (ex ova) for further incubation at 37 degrees C and 80% humidity. After 1 week of incubation, acetaminophen biosensors, used as model sensors, were placed on top of the CAM and allowed to incorporate for 1 week. Biosensors were then tested for their sensitivity to acetaminophen. CAM venules were injected with 0.2 mL of a 3.6 mM acetaminophen solution. The current produced by the sensor reflected the change in blood acetaminophen levels. Sensors were also assessed by using gross and histological evaluations. We previously reported on the similarity of the tissue response of the CAM with the mammalian models. The low cost, simplicity, and possibility to continuously visualize the sensor test site through a cell culture dish make this animal model particularly attractive for the rapid in vivo screening of biosensors. Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 67A: 215-223, 2003

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14517879     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.10055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  14 in total

1.  Improved growth factor directed vascularization into fibrin constructs through inclusion of additional extracellular molecules.

Authors:  J D Smith; M E Melhem; K T Magge; A S Waggoner; P G Campbell
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.514

Review 2.  In vitro, in vivo and post explantation testing of glucose-detecting biosensors: current methods and recommendations.

Authors:  Heidi E Koschwanez; William M Reichert
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  Single walled carbon nanotubes as reporters for the optical detection of glucose.

Authors:  Paul W Barone; Michael S Strano
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-03-01

Review 4.  Consensus guidelines for the use and interpretation of angiogenesis assays.

Authors:  Patrycja Nowak-Sliwinska; Kari Alitalo; Elizabeth Allen; Andrey Anisimov; Alfred C Aplin; Robert Auerbach; Hellmut G Augustin; David O Bates; Judy R van Beijnum; R Hugh F Bender; Gabriele Bergers; Andreas Bikfalvi; Joyce Bischoff; Barbara C Böck; Peter C Brooks; Federico Bussolino; Bertan Cakir; Peter Carmeliet; Daniel Castranova; Anca M Cimpean; Ondine Cleaver; George Coukos; George E Davis; Michele De Palma; Anna Dimberg; Ruud P M Dings; Valentin Djonov; Andrew C Dudley; Neil P Dufton; Sarah-Maria Fendt; Napoleone Ferrara; Marcus Fruttiger; Dai Fukumura; Bart Ghesquière; Yan Gong; Robert J Griffin; Adrian L Harris; Christopher C W Hughes; Nan W Hultgren; M Luisa Iruela-Arispe; Melita Irving; Rakesh K Jain; Raghu Kalluri; Joanna Kalucka; Robert S Kerbel; Jan Kitajewski; Ingeborg Klaassen; Hynda K Kleinmann; Pieter Koolwijk; Elisabeth Kuczynski; Brenda R Kwak; Koen Marien; Juan M Melero-Martin; Lance L Munn; Roberto F Nicosia; Agnes Noel; Jussi Nurro; Anna-Karin Olsson; Tatiana V Petrova; Kristian Pietras; Roberto Pili; Jeffrey W Pollard; Mark J Post; Paul H A Quax; Gabriel A Rabinovich; Marius Raica; Anna M Randi; Domenico Ribatti; Curzio Ruegg; Reinier O Schlingemann; Stefan Schulte-Merker; Lois E H Smith; Jonathan W Song; Steven A Stacker; Jimmy Stalin; Amber N Stratman; Maureen Van de Velde; Victor W M van Hinsbergh; Peter B Vermeulen; Johannes Waltenberger; Brant M Weinstein; Hong Xin; Bahar Yetkin-Arik; Seppo Yla-Herttuala; Mervin C Yoder; Arjan W Griffioen
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 9.596

Review 5.  The chicken chorioallantoic membrane model in biology, medicine and bioengineering.

Authors:  Patrycja Nowak-Sliwinska; Tatiana Segura; M Luisa Iruela-Arispe
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 9.596

Review 6.  The Chicken Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane as an In Vivo Model for Photodynamic Therapy.

Authors:  Jaroslava Joniová; Georges Wagnières
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 7.  Biocompatible materials for continuous glucose monitoring devices.

Authors:  Scott P Nichols; Ahyeon Koh; Wesley L Storm; Jae Ho Shin; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Real-time visualization and quantitation of vascular permeability in vivo: implications for drug delivery.

Authors:  Desmond B S Pink; Wendy Schulte; Missag H Parseghian; Andries Zijlstra; John D Lewis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An angiogenesis platform using a cubic artificial eggshell with patterned blood vessels on chicken chorioallantoic membrane.

Authors:  Wenjing Huang; Makoto Itayama; Fumihito Arai; Katsuko S Furukawa; Takashi Ushida; Tomohiro Kawahara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay for the study of human bone regeneration: a refinement animal model for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Inés Moreno-Jiménez; Gry Hulsart-Billstrom; Stuart A Lanham; Agnieszka A Janeczek; Nasia Kontouli; Janos M Kanczler; Nicholas D Evans; Richard Oc Oreffo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.