Literature DB >> 17507147

A cumulative shear mechanism for tissue damage initiation in shock-wave lithotripsy.

Jonathan B Freund1, Tim Colonius, Andrew P Evan.   

Abstract

Evidence suggests that inertial cavitation plays an important role in the renal injury incurred during shock-wave lithotripsy. However, it is unclear how tissue damage is initiated, and significant injury typically occurs only after a sufficient dose of shock waves. Although it has been suggested that shock-induced shearing might initiate injury, estimates indicate that individual shocks do not produce sufficient shear to do so. In this paper, we hypothesize that the cumulative shear of the many shocks is damaging. This mechanism depends on whether there is sufficient time between shocks for tissue to relax to its unstrained state. We investigate the mechanism with a physics-based simulation model, wherein the basement membranes that define the tubules and vessels in the inner medulla are represented as elastic shells surrounded by viscous fluid. Material properties are estimated from in-vitro tests of renal basement membranes and documented mechanical properties of cells and extracellular gels. Estimates for the net shear deformation from a typical lithotripter shock (approximately 0.1%) are found from a separate dynamic shock simulation. The results suggest that the larger interstitial volume (approximately 40%) near the papilla tip gives the tissue there a relaxation time comparable to clinical shock delivery rates (approximately 1 Hz), thus allowing shear to accumulate. Away from the papilla tip, where the interstitial volume is smaller (approximately 20%), the model tissue relaxes completely before the next shock would be delivered. Implications of the model are that slower delivery rates and broader focal zones should both decrease injury, consistent with some recent observations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17507147      PMCID: PMC2020810          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  26 in total

1.  Dynamics of bubble oscillation in constrained media and mechanisms of vessel rupture in SWL.

Authors:  P Zhong; Y Zhou; S Zhu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Comparison of electrohydraulic lithotripters with rigid and pressure-release ellipsoidal reflectors. II. Cavitation fields.

Authors:  M R Bailey; D T Blackstock; R O Cleveland; L A Crum
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Techniques for mechanical stimulation of cells in vitro: a review.

Authors:  T D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Mechanical haemolysis in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL): I. Analysis of cell deformation due to SWL flow-fields.

Authors:  M Lokhandwalla; B Sturtevant
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Endothelial, cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle exhibit different viscous and elastic properties as determined by atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  A B Mathur; A M Collinsworth; W M Reichert; W E Kraus; G A Truskey
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Microrheology of human lung epithelial cells measured by atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Jordi Alcaraz; Lara Buscemi; Mireia Grabulosa; Xavier Trepat; Ben Fabry; Ramon Farré; Daniel Navajas
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Measuring cell viscoelastic properties using a force-spectrometer: influence of protein-cytoplasm interactions.

Authors:  Elisabetta Canetta; Alain Duperray; Anne Leyrat; Claude Verdier
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.875

8.  The effect of discharge voltage on renal injury and impairment caused by lithotripsy in the pig.

Authors:  Bret A Connors; Andrew P Evan; Lynn R Willis; Philip M Blomgren; James E Lingeman; Naomi S Fineberg
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  Diabetes mellitus and hypertension associated with shock wave lithotripsy of renal and proximal ureteral stones at 19 years of followup.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Matthew T Gettman; Audrey L Rohlinger; Christine M Lohse; David E Patterson; Joseph W Segura
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Kidney damage and renal functional changes are minimized by waveform control that suppresses cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Andrew P Evan; Lynn R Willis; James A McAteer; Michael R Bailey; Bret A Connors; Youzhi Shao; James E Lingeman; James C Williams; Naomi S Fineberg; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  18 in total

1.  Reduction of bubble cavitation by modifying the diffraction wave from a lithotripter aperture.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhou
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  The acute and long-term adverse effects of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.299

3.  Suppression of shocked-bubble expansion due to tissue confinement with application to shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freund
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Shock-induced bubble jetting into a viscous fluid with application to tissue injury in shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J B Freund; R K Shukla; A P Evan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comparison of Broad vs Narrow Focal Width Lithotripter Fields.

Authors:  Yifei Xing; Tony T Chen; Walter N Simmons; Georgy Sankin; Franklin H Cocks; Michael E Lipkin; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Improving the lens design and performance of a contemporary electromagnetic shock wave lithotripter.

Authors:  Andreas Neisius; Nathan B Smith; Georgy Sankin; Nicholas John Kuntz; John Francis Madden; Daniel E Fovargue; Sorin Mitran; Michael Eric Lipkin; Walter Neal Simmons; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Cavitation-induced damage of soft materials by focused ultrasound bursts: A fracture-based bubble dynamics model.

Authors:  Pooya Movahed; Wayne Kreider; Adam D Maxwell; Shelby B Hutchens; Jonathan B Freund
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Techniques: Shockwave lithotripsy may not be a good option in patients with previous renal superselective embolization.

Authors:  Jafar Hussaen; Sero Andonian
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 9.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; Ehud Gnessin; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 10.  Shock wave lithotripsy: the new phoenix?

Authors:  Andreas Neisius; Michael E Lipkin; Jens J Rassweiler; Pei Zhong; Glenn M Preminger; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.