Literature DB >> 10665938

The effect of discharge voltage on renal injury and impairment caused by lithotripsy in the pig.

Bret A Connors1, Andrew P Evan1, Lynn R Willis2, Philip M Blomgren1, James E Lingeman3, Naomi S Fineberg4.   

Abstract

The present study was designed to determine the effects of shock wave voltage (kV) on lesion size and renal function induced by shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in the 6- to 8-wk-old pig. Each SWL-treated pig received 2000 shock waves at 12, 18, or 24 kV to the lower pole calyx of one kidney. A group of sham SWL pigs served as time controls. Bilateral GFR, renal plasma flow (RPF), and para-aminohippurate (PAH) extraction were measured 1 h before and 1 and 4 h after SWL in all treated and sham animals. The kidneys were removed at the end of each experiment for morphometric analysis. The SWL-induced lesion increased significantly in size as shock wave energy was increased from 12 to 24 kV. PAH extraction, a measure of tubular function, was not significantly affected at 12 kV, was transiently reduced at 18 kV, and was reduced for the duration of the experiment at 24 kV. GFR and RPF, however, were significantly and similarly reduced at the 1 h post-SWL period at all three kilovolt levels. At the 4-h post-SWL period, both GFR and RPF had returned to baseline levels. Lesion size and tubular injury were correlated with changes in kilovoltage, while changes in renal hemodynamics were already maximal at the lowest discharge voltage. These findings suggest that renal microvessels are highly sensitive to shock waves and that frank injury to tubules and vessels may be more closely related to discharge energy than is renal blood flow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10665938     DOI: 10.1681/ASN.V112310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  34 in total

1.  Impact of stone removal on renal function: a review.

Authors:  Kyle Wood; Tristan Keys; Patrick Mufarrij; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2011

2.  Detection of significant variation in acoustic output of an electromagnetic lithotriptor.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James A McAteer; R Jason Vonderhaar; Irina V Pishchalnikova; James C Williams; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  The acute and long-term adverse effects of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.299

4.  A cumulative shear mechanism for tissue damage initiation in shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freund; Tim Colonius; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Shock wave lithotripsy and renal hemorrhage.

Authors:  Jonathan Silberstein; Charles M Lakin; J Kellogg Parsons
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

Review 6.  Brushite stone disease as a consequence of lithotripsy?

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Shelly E Handa; Andrew P Evan; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-07-10

7.  Quantitative assessment of shockwave lithotripsy accuracy and the effect of respiratory motion.

Authors:  Mathew D Sorensen; Michael R Bailey; Anup R Shah; Ryan S Hsi; Marla Paun; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Effect of shock wave number on renal oxidative stress and inflammation.

Authors:  Daniel L Clark; Bret A Connors; Andrew P Evan; Rajash K Handa; Sujuan Gao
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Evaluation of the LithoGold LG-380 lithotripter: in vitro acoustic characterization and assessment of renal injury in the pig model.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; James A McAteer; James C Williams; Bret A Connors; Rajash K Handa; James E Lingeman; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 10.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; Ehud Gnessin; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.