Literature DB >> 29382464

Techniques: Shockwave lithotripsy may not be a good option in patients with previous renal superselective embolization.

Jafar Hussaen1, Sero Andonian1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID： 29382464      PMCID： PMC5798446          DOI： 10.5489/cuaj.4453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN： 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  A cumulative shear mechanism for tissue damage initiation in shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freund; Tim Colonius; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Shock wave lithotripsy and renal hemorrhage.

Authors:  Jonathan Silberstein; Charles M Lakin; J Kellogg Parsons
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

3.  Shock wave lithotripsy in patients requiring anticoagulation or antiplatelet agents.

Authors:  Bader Alsaikhan; Sero Andonian
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Risk factors for perinephric hematoma formation after shockwave lithotripsy: a matched case-control analysis.

Authors:  Hassan Razvi; Andrew Fuller; Linda Nott; Carlos E Méndez-Probst; Rasmus Leistner; Kirsten Foell; Sumit Davé; John D Denstedt
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 5.  Management of hemorrhagic complications associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Sero Andonian; Arthur D Smith; David N Siegel
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.942
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.