Literature DB >> 22332839

Reduction of bubble cavitation by modifying the diffraction wave from a lithotripter aperture.

Yufeng Zhou1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A new method was devised to suppress the bubble cavitation in the lithotripter focal zone to reduce the propensity of shockwave-induced renal injury.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An edge extender was designed and fabricated to fit on the outside of the ellipsoidal reflector of an electrohydraulic lithotripter to disturb the generation of diffraction wave at the aperture, but with little effect on the acoustic field inside the reflector.
RESULTS: Although the peak negative pressures at the lithotripter focus using the edge extender at 20 kV were similar to that of the original configuration (-11.1 ± 0.9 vs -10.6 ± 0.7 MPa), the duration of the tensile wave was shortened significantly (3.2 ± 0.54 vs 5.83 ± 0.56 μs, P<0.01). There is no difference, however, in both the amplitude and duration of the compressive shockwaves between these two configurations as well as the -6 dB beam width in the focal plane. The significant suppression effect of bubble cavitation was confirmed by the measured bubble collapse time using passive cavitation detection. At the lithotripter focus, while only about 30 shocks were needed to rupture a blood vessel phantom using the original HM-3 reflector at 20 kV, no damage could be produced after 300 shocks using the edge extender. Meanwhile, the original HM-3 lithotripter at 20 kV can achieve a stone comminution efficiency of 50.4 ± 2.0% on plaster-of-Paris stone phantom after 200 shocks, which is comparable to that of using the edge extender (46.8 ± 4.1%, P=0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Modifying the diffraction wave at the lithotripter aperture can suppress the shockwave-induced bubble cavitation with significant reduced damage potential on the vessel phantom but satisfactory stone comminution ability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22332839      PMCID: PMC3412060          DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  31 in total

1.  Suppression of large intraluminal bubble expansion in shock wave lithotripsy without compromising stone comminution: methodology and in vitro experiments.

Authors:  P Zhong; Y Zhou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Suppression of large intraluminal bubble expansion in shock wave lithotripsy without compromising stone comminution: refinement of reflector geometry.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhou; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Reduction of tissue injury in shock-wave lithotripsy by using an acoustic diode.

Authors:  Songlin Zhu; Thomas Dreyer; Marko Liebler; Rainer Riedlinger; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Efficacy of second generation lithotriptors: a multicenter comparative study of 2,206 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatments with the Siemens Lithostar, Dornier HM4, Wolf Piezolith 2300, Direx Tripter X-1 and Breakstone lithotriptors.

Authors:  A F Bierkens; A J Hendrikx; V J de Kort; T de Reyke; C A Bruynen; E R Bouve; T V Beek; P Vos; H V Berkel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Bioeffects of positive and negative acoustic pressures in vivo.

Authors:  M R Bailey; D Dalecki; S Z Child; C H Raeman; D P Penney; D T Blackstock; E L Carstensen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Development, instrumentation, and current status.

Authors:  J E Lingeman
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 7.  Cavitation microjets as a contributory mechanism for renal calculi disintegration in ESWL.

Authors:  L A Crum
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Minimal static excess pressure minimises the effect of extracorporeal shock waves on cells and reduces it on gallstones.

Authors:  M Delius
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Comparative studies of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy by Dornier HM3, EDAP LT 01 and Sonolith 2000 devices.

Authors:  E C Tan; K H Tung; K T Foo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Kidney damage and renal functional changes are minimized by waveform control that suppresses cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Andrew P Evan; Lynn R Willis; James A McAteer; Michael R Bailey; Bret A Connors; Youzhi Shao; James E Lingeman; James C Williams; Naomi S Fineberg; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Engineering Better Lithotripters.

Authors:  Christian G Chaussy; Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Sonoporation-induced cell membrane permeabilization and cytoskeleton disassembly at varied acoustic and microbubble-cell parameters.

Authors:  Maochen Wang; Yi Zhang; Chenliang Cai; Juan Tu; Xiasheng Guo; Dong Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.