Literature DB >> 18565638

Language processing in reading and speech perception is fast and incremental: implications for event-related potential research.

Keith Rayner1, Charles Clifton.   

Abstract

An overview of language processing during reading and listening is provided. Evidence is reviewed indicating that language processing in both domains is fast and incremental. We also discuss some aspects of normal reading and listening that are often obscured in event-related potential (ERP) research. We also discuss some apparent limitations of ERP techniques, as well as some recent indications that electroencephalographic (EEG) measures can be used to probe how lexical knowledge and lexical or structural expectations can contribute to the incremental process of language comprehension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18565638      PMCID: PMC2649675          DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  37 in total

1.  The effect of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; G Kambe; S A Duffy
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-11

2.  Measuring word recognition in reading: eye movements and event-related potentials.

Authors:  Sara C Sereno; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Synchronizing timelines: relations between fixation durations and N400 amplitudes during sentence reading.

Authors:  Michael Dambacher; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination.

Authors:  K Rayner; A D Well
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-12

6.  Testing an assumption of the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control during reading: using event-related potentials to examine the familiarity check.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Natasha Tokowicz; Ying Liu; Charles A Perfetti
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.

Authors:  W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

9.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

10.  Reading without a fovea.

Authors:  K Rayner; J H Bertera
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  20 in total

1.  Quantifiers more or less quantify online: ERP evidence for partial incremental interpretation.

Authors:  Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Never Seem to Find the Time: Evaluating the Physiological Time Course of Visual Word Recognition with Regression Analysis of Single Item ERPs.

Authors:  Sarah Laszlo; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2014

3.  Quantifiers are incrementally interpreted in context, more than less.

Authors:  Thomas P Urbach; Katherine A DeLong; Marta Kutas
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Neurophysiology of Hungarian subject-verb dependencies with varying intervening complexity.

Authors:  Hajnal Jolsvai; Elyse Sussman; Roland Csuhaj; Valéria Csépe
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Kazunaga Matsuki; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Pain-related and negative semantic priming enhances perceived pain intensity.

Authors:  Maria Richter; Christoph Schroeter; Theresa Puensch; Thomas Straube; Holger Hecht; Alexander Ritter; Wolfgang H R Miltner; Thomas Weiss
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.037

7.  Incrementality and efficiency shape pragmatics across languages.

Authors:  Paula Rubio-Fernandez; Julian Jara-Ettinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Parafoveal-foveal overlap can facilitate ongoing word identification during reading: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Bernhard Angele; Randy Tran; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  ERP evidence for memory and predictive mechanisms in word-to-text integration.

Authors:  Joseph Z Stafura; Benjamin Rickles; Charles A Perfetti
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Word Frequency Effects in Naturalistic Reading.

Authors:  Rutvik H Desai; Wonil Choi; John M Henderson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.