Literature DB >> 17492290

Automated CT volumetry of pulmonary metastases: the effect of a reduced growth threshold and target lesion number on the reliability of therapy response assessment using RECIST criteria.

Katharina Marten1, Florian Auer, Stefan Schmidt, Ernst J Rummeny, Christoph Engelke.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of CT-volumetric tumour response assessment of pulmonary metastasis using variable volume change thresholds (VCT) and target lesions with response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST). Fifty consecutive patients with pulmonary metastases undergoing follow-up multislice CT under chemotherapy were assessed for response to chemotherapy with modifications to RECIST: (1) decreasing the percentual VCT for diagnosis of tumour response (range = 70%-20%), (2) reducing the number of target lesions (range = 1-5). Continuous and categorical observer agreements were tested by Bland and Altman and extended (kappa(e)) or non-weighted kappa (kappa) and correlated with percentual VCT to predict observer agreement. A total of 202 metastases were evaluated (average volume = 522.4 mm(3) +/- 902.4 mm(3)). General agreement on treatment response was very high (kappa(e) = 0.93-1), but was reduced with VCT < 35% (kappa(e) < 0.95). Kappa correlation with VCT values was strong (r=0.94-0.96; p< or =0.0002). Average confidence decreased significantly at VCT < 45% (p < 0.01) and agreement on stable disease at VCT < 35% (kappa(e) < 0.95; p < 0.01). Reduction of target lesions (n < 3; VCT = 35%) resulted in decreased reader confidence (for n = 1: kappa = 0.49; p < 0.05). Agreement for evaluation of treatment response was robust using VCT > or =35% and > or =3 metastases. This may translate into shortening of follow-up intervals or enable for response assessment with tumours displaying minimal volume change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17492290     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0642-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   7.034


  24 in total

1.  Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation.

Authors:  D F Yankelevitz; A P Reeves; W J Kostis; B Zhao; C I Henschke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Small pulmonary nodules: reproducibility of three-dimensional volumetric measurement and estimation of time to follow-up CT.

Authors:  William J Kostis; David F Yankelevitz; Anthony P Reeves; Simina C Fluture; Claudia I Henschke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Is there a role for PET in the evaluation of subcentimeter pulmonary nodules?

Authors:  Kemp H Kernstine; Frederic W Grannis; Arnold J Rotter
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005

5.  Comparing the classification of subjects by two independent judges.

Authors:  A E Maxwell
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 9.319

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Results of an independent oncology review board of pivotal clinical trials of gemcitabine in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  S J Gwyther; M S Aapro; S R Hatty; P E Postmus; I E Smith
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.248

8.  Variability in response assessment in solid tumors: effect of number of lesions chosen for measurement.

Authors:  Lawrence H Schwartz; Madhu Mazumdar; Wendy Brown; Alex Smith; David M Panicek
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Pulmonary metastases tumor doubling time: assessment by computed tomography.

Authors:  Rubens Chojniak; Riad N Younes
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 10.  Evaluation of the response to treatment of solid tumours - a consensus statement of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

Authors:  J E Husband; L H Schwartz; J Spencer; L Ollivier; D M King; R Johnson; R Reznek
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-06-14       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  12 in total

1.  Evaluation of a method of computer-aided detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules with computed tomography.

Authors:  G Foti; N Faccioli; M D'Onofrio; A Contro; T Milazzo; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Inter- and intrascanner variability of pulmonary nodule volumetry on low-dose 64-row CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study.

Authors:  X Xie; M J Willemink; Y Zhao; P A de Jong; P M A van Ooijen; M Oudkerk; M J W Greuter; R Vliegenthart
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Advances in Imaging and Automated Quantification of Malignant Pulmonary Diseases: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Bruno Hochhegger; Matheus Zanon; Stephan Altmayer; Gabriel S Pacini; Fernanda Balbinot; Martina Z Francisco; Ruhana Dalla Costa; Guilherme Watte; Marcel Koenigkam Santos; Marcelo C Barros; Diana Penha; Klaus Irion; Edson Marchiori
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 2.584

4.  Pulmonary Nodules: growth rate assessment in patients by using serial CT and three-dimensional volumetry.

Authors:  Jane P Ko; Erika J Berman; Manmeen Kaur; James S Babb; Elan Bomsztyk; Alissa K Greenberg; David P Naidich; Henry Rusinek
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Treatment response classification of liver metastatic disease evaluated on imaging. Are RECIST unidimensional measurements accurate?

Authors:  Michael Mantatzis; Stylianos Kakolyris; Kyriakos Amarantidis; Anastasios Karayiannakis; Panos Prassopoulos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Comparison of response evaluation criteria in solid tumors with volumetric measurements for estimation of tumor burden in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jessemae L Welsh; Kellie Bodeker; Elizabeth Fallon; Sundershan K Bhatia; John M Buatti; Joseph J Cullen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Reduction in growth threshold for pulmonary metastases: an opportunity for volumetry and its impact on treatment decisions.

Authors:  M N Vogel; S Schmücker; O Maksimovic; J Hartmann; C D Claussen; M Horger
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Evaluation of circulating cell-free DNA as a molecular monitoring tool in patients with metastatic cancer.

Authors:  Clemens Hufnagl; Michael Leisch; Lukas Weiss; Thomas Melchardt; Martin Moik; Daniela Asslaber; Geisberger Roland; Philipp Steininger; Thomas Meissnitzer; Daniel Neureiter; Richard Greil; Alexander Egle
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 9.  [Automated procedure for volumetric measurement of metastases: estimation of tumor burden].

Authors:  M Fabel; H Bolte
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  Prognostic value of different CT measurements in early therapy response evaluation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M W Huellner; T P Hennedige; R Winterhalder; T Zander; S K Venkatesh; W P Yong; R A Soo; B Seifert; T C Treumann; K Strobel; P Veit-Haibach
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.