Literature DB >> 10573200

Results of an independent oncology review board of pivotal clinical trials of gemcitabine in non-small cell lung cancer.

S J Gwyther1, M S Aapro, S R Hatty, P E Postmus, I E Smith.   

Abstract

Response rates reported in early phase II clinical trials are often not reproduced in subsequent larger or phase III studies. Independent review of claimed partial or complete responders to gemcitabine was undertaken in four pivotal, open-label phase II studies of advanced, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to provide accurate, consistent, reproducible response rates. Patients were chemonaive and had stage III or IV NSCLC. In three trials, gemcitabine (800 and 1250 mg/m2) was administered once-weekly for 3 weeks followed by a rest week. In the fourth, gemcitabine (90 mg/m2) was given twice-weekly for 3 weeks in every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was response rate. Of the 374 evaluable patients, 114 (30%) were claimed as responders. Independent review reduced this to 79 (21%). The response range was reduced from 25-35 to 20-23% after validation; 95% confidence intervals did not overlap. Consistent application of response criteria by an independent panel significantly reduced response rates but produced greater consistency and reproducibility. These results confirm that gemcitabine is active against NSCLC. Subsequent larger-scale studies have produced comparable response rates, vindicating the use of independent review. Independent review is recommended for all trials using response rate as a primary endpoint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10573200     DOI: 10.1097/00001813-199909000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Drugs        ISSN: 0959-4973            Impact factor:   2.248


  4 in total

1.  Inadequacy of manual measurements compared to automated CT volumetry in assessment of treatment response of pulmonary metastases using RECIST criteria.

Authors:  Katharina Marten; Florian Auer; Stefan Schmidt; Gerhard Kohl; Ernst J Rummeny; Christoph Engelke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Economic evaluation of gemcitabine alone and in combination with cisplatin in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M Lees; M Aristides; N Maniadakis; J McKendrick; N Botwood; D Stephenson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Do Diametric Measurements Provide Sufficient and Reliable Tumor Assessment? An Evaluation of Diametric, Areametric, and Volumetric Variability of Lung Lesion Measurements on Computerized Tomography Scans.

Authors:  Aaron Frenette; Joshua Morrell; Kirk Bjella; Edward Fogarty; James Beal; Vijay Chaudhary
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.375

4.  Automated CT volumetry of pulmonary metastases: the effect of a reduced growth threshold and target lesion number on the reliability of therapy response assessment using RECIST criteria.

Authors:  Katharina Marten; Florian Auer; Stefan Schmidt; Ernst J Rummeny; Christoph Engelke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 7.034

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.