Literature DB >> 31966080

Evaluation of circulating cell-free DNA as a molecular monitoring tool in patients with metastatic cancer.

Clemens Hufnagl1, Michael Leisch2,3,4, Lukas Weiss2,3,4, Thomas Melchardt2,3,4, Martin Moik2,3,4, Daniela Asslaber2,3,4, Geisberger Roland2,3,4, Philipp Steininger5, Thomas Meissnitzer6, Daniel Neureiter1, Richard Greil2,3,4, Alexander Egle2,3,4.   

Abstract

The clinical decisions made when treating patients with metastatic cancer require knowledge of the current tumor extent and response to therapy. For the majority of solid tumors, a response assessment, which is based on imaging, is used to guide these decisions. However, measuring serum protein biomarkers (i.e. tumor markers) may be of additional use. Furthermore, tumor markers exhibit variable specificity and sensitivity and cannot therefore be solely relied upon when making decisions regarding cancer treatment. Therefore, there is a clinical requirement for the identification of specific, sensitive and quantitative biomarkers. In recent years, circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and mutation-specific circulating cell-free tumor DNA (cftDNA) have been identified as novel potential biomarkers. In the current study, cfDNA and cftDNA were compared using imaging-based staging and current tumor markers in 15 patients with metastatic colorectal, pancreatic or breast cancer. These patients were treated at the Third Medical Department of Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg (Austria). The results of the current study demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between the concentration changes of cfDNA and cftDNA and response to treatment, which was assessed by imaging. A correlation was not indicated with current clinically used tumor markers, including carcinoembryonic antigen, carcinoma antigen 15-3 and carcinoma antigen 19-9. The present study also indicated a correlation between cfDNA and cftDNA and the tumor volume of metastatic lesions, which was not observed with the current clinically used tumor markers. In conclusion, cfDNA and cftDNA exhibit the potential to become novel biomarkers for the response assessment following cancer treatment, and may serve as a tool for the estimation of tumor volume. The current study further supports the increasingly important role of cfDNA and cftDNA as new monitoring tools for use during cancer therapy.
Copyright © 2020, Spandidos Publications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  circulating cell-free DNA; circulating cell-free tumor DNA; liquid biopsy; serum tumor markers; tumor burden; tumor-volumetry

Year:  2019        PMID: 31966080      PMCID: PMC6956108          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.11192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  59 in total

1.  The RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists.

Authors:  A R Padhani; L Ollivier
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  How Can Next-Generation Sequencing (Genomics) Help Us in Treating Colorectal Cancer?

Authors:  Kristen K Ciombor; Sigurdis Haraldsdottir; Richard M Goldberg
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2014-12-01

3.  The clinical utility of serum CA 19-9 in the diagnosis, prognosis and management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: An evidence based appraisal.

Authors:  Umashankar K Ballehaninna; Ronald S Chamberlain
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2012-06

Review 4.  Liquid biopsies in lung cancer: the new ambrosia of researchers.

Authors:  Christian Rolfo; Marta Castiglia; David Hong; Riccardo Alessandro; Inge Mertens; Geert Baggerman; Karen Zwaenepoel; Ignacio Gil-Bazo; Francesco Passiglia; Anna P Carreca; Simona Taverna; Renza Vento; Daniele Santini; Marc Peeters; Antonio Russo; Patrick Pauwels
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-10-16

5.  RECIST 1.1 compared with RECIST 1.0 in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy.

Authors:  Katherine M Krajewski; Mizuki Nishino; Nikhil H Ramaiya; Toni K Choueiri
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Comparison of WHO and RECIST criteria for response in metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jung-Hye Choi; Myung-Ju Ahn; Hyan-Chul Rhim; Jin-Woo Kim; Gang-Hong Lee; Young-Yeul Lee; In-Soon Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 4.679

7.  Frequent mutation of the PI3K pathway in head and neck cancer defines predictive biomarkers.

Authors:  Vivian W Y Lui; Matthew L Hedberg; Hua Li; Bhavana S Vangara; Kelsey Pendleton; Yan Zeng; Yiling Lu; Qiuhong Zhang; Yu Du; Breean R Gilbert; Maria Freilino; Sam Sauerwein; Noah D Peyser; Dong Xiao; Brenda Diergaarde; Lin Wang; Simion Chiosea; Raja Seethala; Jonas T Johnson; Seungwon Kim; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Robert L Ferris; Marjorie Romkes; Tomoko Nukui; Patrick Kwok-Shing Ng; Levi A Garraway; Peter S Hammerman; Gordon B Mills; Jennifer R Grandis
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 8.  American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer.

Authors:  Lyndsay Harris; Herbert Fritsche; Robert Mennel; Larry Norton; Peter Ravdin; Sheila Taube; Mark R Somerfield; Daniel F Hayes; Robert C Bast
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Circulating nucleic acids in plasma/serum.

Authors:  Jason C H Tsang; Y M Dennis Lo
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.306

Review 10.  Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  D S Michaud
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.000

View more
  4 in total

1.  Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Authors:  ZhiYu Zhao; Wei Liu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

Review 2.  Can Circulating Cell-Free DNA or Circulating Tumor DNA Be a Promising Marker in Ovarian Cancer?

Authors:  Ming Yu; Yu Zhu; Lichen Teng; Jialin Cui; Yajuan Su
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.375

3.  Use of plasma ctDNA as a potential biomarker for longitudinal monitoring of a patient with metastatic high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma receiving pembrolizumab and personalized neoepitope-derived multipeptide vaccinations: a case report.

Authors:  Carolin Blumendeller; Julius Boehme; Maximilian Frick; Martin Schulze; Antje Rinckleb; Christina Kyzirakos; Simone Kayser; Maria Kopp; Sabine Kelkenberg; Natalia Pieper; Oliver Bartsch; Dirk Hadaschick; Florian Battke; Arnulf Stenzl; Saskia Biskup
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 13.751

4.  The amount of DNA combined with TP53 mutations in liquid biopsy is associated with clinical outcome of renal cancer patients treated with immunotherapy and VEGFR-TKIs.

Authors:  Marzia Del Re; Stefania Crucitta; Federico Paolieri; Federico Cucchiara; Elena Verzoni; Francesco Bloise; Raffaele Ciampi; Chiara Mercinelli; Annalisa Capuano; Liberata Sportiello; Antonia Martinetti; Giuseppe Procopio; Luca Galli; Camillo Porta; Sergio Bracarda; Romano Danesi
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 8.440

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.