Literature DB >> 22156993

Pulmonary Nodules: growth rate assessment in patients by using serial CT and three-dimensional volumetry.

Jane P Ko1, Erika J Berman, Manmeen Kaur, James S Babb, Elan Bomsztyk, Alissa K Greenberg, David P Naidich, Henry Rusinek.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the precision of a three-dimensional (3D) method for measuring the growth rate of solid and subsolid nodules and its ability to detect abnormal growth rates.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the Institutional Research Board and was HIPAA compliant. Informed consent was waived. The growth rates of 123 lung nodules in 59 patients who had undergone lung cancer screening computed tomography (CT) were measured by using a 3D semiautomated computer-assisted volume method. Clinical stability was established with long-term CT follow-up (mean, 6.4 years±1.9 [standard deviation]; range, 2.0-8.5 years). A mean of 4.1 CT examinations per patient±1.2 (range, two to seven CT examinations per patient) was analyzed during 2.4 years±0.5 after baseline CT. Nodule morphology, attenuation, and location were characterized. The analysis of standard deviation of growth rate in relation to time between scans yielded a normative model for detecting abnormal growth.
RESULTS: Growth rate precision increased with greater time between scans. Overall estimate for standard deviation of growth rate, on the basis of 939 growth rate determinations in clinically stable nodules, was 36.5% per year. Peripheral location (P=.01; 37.1% per year vs 25.6% per year) and adjacency to pleural surface (P=.05; 38.9% per year vs 34.0% per year) significantly increased standard deviation of growth rate. All eight malignant nodules had an abnormally high growth rate detected. By using 3D volumetry, growth rate-based diagnosis of malignancy was made at a mean of 183 days±158, compared with radiologic or clinical diagnosis at 344 days±284.
CONCLUSION: A normative model derived from the variability of growth rates of nodules that were stable for an average of 6.4 years may enable identification of lung cancer. © RSNA, 2011

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22156993      PMCID: PMC3267080          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11100878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  48 in total

1.  Part-solid nodules: two steps forward....

Authors:  David P Naidich
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Variability of semiautomated lung nodule volumetry on ultralow-dose CT: comparison with nodule volumetry on standard-dose CT.

Authors:  Patrick A Hein; Valentina C Romano; Patrik Rogalla; Christian Klessen; Alexander Lembcke; Lars Bornemann; Volker Dicken; Bernd Hamm; Hans-Christian Bauknecht
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Evaluation of patients with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer?: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition).

Authors:  Michael K Gould; James Fletcher; Mark D Iannettoni; William R Lynch; David E Midthun; David P Naidich; David E Ost
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Pulmonary nodules: 3D volumetric measurement with multidetector CT--effect of intravenous contrast medium.

Authors:  Osamu Honda; Takeshi Johkoh; Hiromitsu Sumikawa; Atsuo Inoue; Noriyuki Tomiyama; Naoki Mihara; Yuka Fujita; Mitsuko Tsubamoto; Masahiro Yanagawa; Tadahisa Daimon; Javzandulam Natsag; Hironobu Nakamura
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Pulmonary nodules: Interscan variability of semiautomated volume measurements with multisection CT-- influence of inspiration level, nodule size, and segmentation performance.

Authors:  Hester A Gietema; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop; Willem P T M Mali; Gerard Groenewegen; Mathias Prokop
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Persistent pulmonary nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histopathologic comparisons.

Authors:  Ha Young Kim; Young Mog Shim; Kyung Soo Lee; Joungho Han; Chin A Yi; Yoon Kyung Kim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  5-year lung cancer screening experience: growth curves of 18 lung cancers compared to histologic type, CT attenuation, stage, survival, and size.

Authors:  Rebecca M Lindell; Thomas E Hartman; Stephen J Swensen; James R Jett; David E Midthun; Jayawant N Mandrekar
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Volumetric measurement of pulmonary nodules at low-dose chest CT: effect of reconstruction setting on measurement variability.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Geertruida H de Bock; Rob J van Klaveren; Peter van Ooyen; Wim Tukker; Yingru Zhao; Monique D Dorrius; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart Proença; Wendy J Post; Matthijs Oudkerk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Automated CT volumetry of pulmonary metastases: the effect of a reduced growth threshold and target lesion number on the reliability of therapy response assessment using RECIST criteria.

Authors:  Katharina Marten; Florian Auer; Stefan Schmidt; Ernst J Rummeny; Christoph Engelke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 7.034

View more
  28 in total

1.  Return of the pulmonary nodule: the radiologist's key role in implementing the 2015 BTS guidelines on the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Richard N J Graham; David R Baldwin; Matthew E J Callister; Fergus V Gleeson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Update in lung cancer and mesothelioma 2012.

Authors:  Charles A Powell; Balazs Halmos; Serge P Nana-Sinkam
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Assessment of change in prostate volume and shape following surgical resection through co-registration of in-vivo MRI and fresh specimen ex-vivo MRI.

Authors:  C Orczyk; S S Taneja; H Rusinek; A B Rosenkrantz
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 4.  Management strategy of solitary pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Ping Zhan; Haiyan Xie; Chunhua Xu; Keke Hao; Zhibo Hou; Yong Song
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  A dynamic lesion model for differentiation of malignant and benign pathologies.

Authors:  Weiguo Cao; Zhengrong Liang; Yongfeng Gao; Marc J Pomeroy; Fangfang Han; Almas Abbasi; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The self-overlap method for assessment of lung nodule morphology in chest CT.

Authors:  Joseph N Stember; Jane P Ko; David P Naidich; Manmeen Kaur; Henry Rusinek
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Optimisation of volume-doubling time cutoff for fast-growing lung nodules in CT lung cancer screening reduces false-positive referrals.

Authors:  Marjolein A Heuvelmans; Matthijs Oudkerk; Geertruida H de Bock; Harry J de Koning; Xueqian Xie; Peter M A van Ooijen; Marcel J W Greuter; Pim A de Jong; Harry J M Groen; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  The normal mode analysis shape detection method for automated shape determination of lung nodules.

Authors:  Joseph N Stember
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Ultrasound assessment of gastric volume in critically ill patients.

Authors:  S R Hamada; P Garcon; M Ronot; S Kerever; C Paugam-Burtz; J Mantz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Semi-automated pulmonary nodule interval segmentation using the NLST data.

Authors:  Yoganand Balagurunathan; Andrew Beers; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Michael McNitt-Gray; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Bensheng Zhao; Jiangguo Zhu; Hao Yang; Stephen S F Yip; Hugo J W L Aerts; Sandy Napel; Dmitrii Cherezov; Kenny Cha; Heang-Ping Chan; Carlos Flores; Alberto Garcia; Robert Gillies; Dmitry Goldgof
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.