Literature DB >> 17489907

Primary care practice organization influences colorectal cancer screening performance.

Elizabeth M Yano1, Lynn M Soban, Patricia H Parkerton, David A Etzioni.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify primary care practice characteristics associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening performance, controlling for patient-level factors. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: Primary care director survey (1999-2000) of 155 VA primary care clinics linked with 38,818 eligible patients' sociodemographics, utilization, and CRC screening experience using centralized administrative and chart-review data (2001). STUDY
DESIGN: Practices were characterized by degrees of centralization (e.g., authority over operations, staffing, outside-practice influence); resources (e.g., sufficiency of nonphysician staffing, space, clinical support arrangements); and complexity (e.g., facility size, academic status, managed care penetration), adjusting for patient-level covariates and contextual factors. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: Chart-based evidence of CRC screening through direct colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, or consecutive fecal occult blood tests, eliminating cases with documented histories of CRC, polyps, or inflammatory bowel disease. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and health care utilization, patients were significantly more likely to be screened for CRC if their primary care practices had greater autonomy over the internal structure of care delivery (p<.04), more clinical support arrangements (p<.03), and smaller size (p<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Deficits in primary care clinical support arrangements and local autonomy over operational management and referral procedures are associated with significantly lower CRC screening performance. Competition with hospital resource demands may impinge on the degree of internal organization of their affiliated primary care practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17489907      PMCID: PMC1955248          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00643.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  43 in total

1.  Health services research.

Authors:  Jonathan Lomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-12-06

2.  Primary care practice and facility quality orientation: influence on breast and cervical cancer screening rates.

Authors:  Caroline Lubick Goldzweig; Patricia H Parkerton; Donna L Washington; Andrew B Lanto; Elizabeth M Yano
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 3.  Adherence with colorectal cancer screening guidelines: a review.

Authors:  Sujha Subramanian; Michelle Klosterman; Mayur M Amonkar; Timothy L Hunt
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Building consensus in health care: a guide to using the nominal group technique.

Authors:  Jane Allen; Jane Dyas; Margaret Jones
Journal:  Br J Community Nurs       Date:  2004-03

5.  Primary care practice organization and preventive services delivery: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  B F Crabtree; W L Miller; V A Aita; S A Flocke; K C Stange
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  Colorectal cancer screening, 1997-1999: role of income, insurance and policy.

Authors:  E Kathleen Adams; Kenneth E Thorpe; Edmund R Becker; Peter J Joski; Jennifer Flome
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Primary care provider perceptions of barriers to and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in a managed care setting.

Authors:  Gareth S Dulai; Melissa M Farmer; Patricia A Ganz; Coen A Bernaards; Karen Qi; Allen J Dietrich; Roshan Bastani; Michael J Belman; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Comparing the health status of VA and non-VA ambulatory patients: the veterans' health and medical outcomes studies.

Authors:  William H Rogers; Lewis E Kazis; Donald R Miller; Katherine M Skinner; Jack A Clark; Avron Spiro; R Graeme Fincke
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep

9.  Acceptance of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Daniel E Montaño; Joseph V Selby; Carol P Somkin; Aradhana Bhat; Marion Nadel
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2004

10.  Pitfalls of converting practice guidelines into quality measures: lessons learned from a VA performance measure.

Authors:  Louise C Walter; Natalie P Davidowitz; Paul A Heineken; Kenneth E Covinsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  Multilevel interventions: measurement and measures.

Authors:  Martin P Charns; Mary K Foster; Elaine C Alligood; Justin K Benzer; James F Burgess; Donna Li; Nathalie M McIntosh; Allison Burness; Melissa R Partin; Steven B Clauser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

2.  The evolution of changes in primary care delivery underlying the Veterans Health Administration's quality transformation.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Yano; Barbara F Simon; Andrew B Lanto; Lisa V Rubenstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Across Healthcare Systems.

Authors:  Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Shivan J Mehta; Yingye Zheng; Nirupa R Ghai; Dale F McLerran; Jessica Chubak; Virginia P Quinn; Celette Sugg Skinner; Douglas A Corley; John M Inadomi; Chyke A Doubeni
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Levels and variation in overuse of fecal occult blood testing in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Melissa R Partin; Adam A Powell; Ann Bangerter; Krysten Halek; James F Burgess; Deborah A Fisher; David B Nelson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Using computational modeling to assess the impact of clinical decision support on cancer screening improvement strategies within the community health centers.

Authors:  Timothy Jay Carney; Geoffrey P Morgan; Josette Jones; Anna M McDaniel; Michael Weaver; Bryan Weiner; David A Haggstrom
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 6.  Organizational factors and the cancer screening process.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price; Jane Zapka; Heather Edwards; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

7.  Intraclass correlation estimates for cancer screening outcomes: estimates and applications in the design of group-randomized cancer screening studies.

Authors:  Erinn M Hade; David M Murray; Michael L Pennell; Dale Rhoda; Electra D Paskett; Victoria L Champion; Benjamin F Crabtree; Allen Dietrich; Mark B Dignan; Melissa Farmer; Joshua J Fenton; Susan Flocke; Robert A Hiatt; Shawna V Hudson; Michael Mitchell; Patrick Monahan; Salma Shariff-Marco; Stacey L Slone; Kurt Stange; Susan L Stewart; Pamela A Ohman Strickland
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

8.  Measuring Workplace Climate in Community Clinics and Health Centers.

Authors:  Mark W Friedberg; Hector P Rodriguez; Grant R Martsolf; Maria O Edelen; Arturo Vargas Bustamante
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Cost-effectiveness of a standard intervention versus a navigated intervention on colorectal cancer screening use in primary care.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Melissa Dicarlo; Ashish A Deshmuk; Heather B Fagan; Randa Sifri; Nora Katurakes; James Cocroft; Jocelyn Sendecki; Heidi Swan; Sally W Vernon; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Multi-level Influences on Breast Cancer Screening in Primary Care.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Tor D Tosteson; Julie Weiss; Jennifer S Haas; Martha Goodrich; Roberta DiFlorio; Charles Brackett; Cheryl Clark; Kimberly Harris; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.