Elizabeth M Yano1, Barbara F Simon, Andrew B Lanto, Lisa V Rubenstein. 1. Veterans Health Administration Greater Los Angeles Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center of Excellence, Los Angeles, Calif 91343, USA. elizabeth.yano@va.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Suffering from waning demand, poor quality, and reform efforts enabling veterans to "vote with their feet" and leave, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) health care system transformed itself through a series of substantive changes. We examined the evolution of primary care changes underlying VA's transformation. METHODS: We used 3 national organizational surveys from 1993, 1996, and 1999 that measured primary care organization, staffing, management, and resource sufficiency to evaluate changes in VA primary care delivery. RESULTS: Only rudimentary primary care was in place in 1993. Primary care enrollment grew from 38% in 1993 to 45% in 1996, and to 95% in 1999 as VA adopted team structures and increased the assignment of patients to individual providers. Specialists initially staffed primary care until generalist physicians and nonphysican providers increased. Primary care-based quality improvement and authority expanded, and resource sufficiency (e.g., computers, space) grew. Provider notification of admissions and emergency department, urgent-care visit, and sub-specialty-consult results increased nearly 5 times. CONCLUSIONS: Although VA's quality transformation had many underlying causes, investment in primary care development may have served as an essential substrate for many VA quality gains.
OBJECTIVES: Suffering from waning demand, poor quality, and reform efforts enabling veterans to "vote with their feet" and leave, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) health care system transformed itself through a series of substantive changes. We examined the evolution of primary care changes underlying VA's transformation. METHODS: We used 3 national organizational surveys from 1993, 1996, and 1999 that measured primary care organization, staffing, management, and resource sufficiency to evaluate changes in VA primary care delivery. RESULTS: Only rudimentary primary care was in place in 1993. Primary care enrollment grew from 38% in 1993 to 45% in 1996, and to 95% in 1999 as VA adopted team structures and increased the assignment of patients to individual providers. Specialists initially staffed primary care until generalist physicians and nonphysican providers increased. Primary care-based quality improvement and authority expanded, and resource sufficiency (e.g., computers, space) grew. Provider notification of admissions and emergency department, urgent-care visit, and sub-specialty-consult results increased nearly 5 times. CONCLUSIONS: Although VA's quality transformation had many underlying causes, investment in primary care development may have served as an essential substrate for many VA quality gains.
Authors: Caroline Lubick Goldzweig; Patricia H Parkerton; Donna L Washington; Andrew B Lanto; Elizabeth M Yano Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Eve A Kerr; Robert B Gerzoff; Sarah L Krein; Joseph V Selby; John D Piette; J David Curb; William H Herman; David G Marrero; K M Venkat Narayan; Monika M Safford; Theodore Thompson; Carol M Mangione Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2004-08-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: John M Byrne; Barbara K Chang; Stuart C Gilman; Sheri A Keitz; Catherine P Kaminetzky; David C Aron; Sam Baz; Grant W Cannon; Robert A Zeiss; Gloria J Holland; T Michael Kashner Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2013-12
Authors: Julian Brunner; Emmeline Chuang; Caroline Goldzweig; Cindy L Cain; Catherine Sugar; Elizabeth M Yano Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Hector P Rodriguez; Karleen F Giannitrapani; Susan Stockdale; Alison B Hamilton; Elizabeth M Yano; Lisa V Rubenstein Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jane Forman; Molly Harrod; Claire Robinson; Ann Annis-Emeott; Jessica Ott; Darcy Saffar; Sarah L Krein; Clinton L Greenstone Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Erin P Finley; Jacqueline A Pugh; Holly Jordan Lanham; Luci K Leykum; John Cornell; Poornachand Veerapaneni; Michael L Parchman Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2013 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Elizabeth M Yano; Patricia Hayes; Steven Wright; Paula P Schnurr; Linda Lipson; Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Donna L Washington Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 5.128