Literature DB >> 22810358

Levels and variation in overuse of fecal occult blood testing in the Veterans Health Administration.

Melissa R Partin1, Adam A Powell, Ann Bangerter, Krysten Halek, James F Burgess, Deborah A Fisher, David B Nelson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Policy-makers have called for efforts to reduce overuse of cancer screening tests, including colorectal cancer screening (CRCS). Overuse of CRCS tests other than colonoscopy has not been well documented.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate levels and correlates of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) overuse in a national Veterans Health Administration (VHA) sample.
DESIGN: Observational PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 1,844 CRCS-eligible patients who responded to a 2007 CRCS survey conducted in 24 VHA facilities and had one or more FOBTs between 2003 and 2009. MAIN MEASURES: We combined survey data on race, education, and income with administrative data on region, age, gender, CRCS procedures, and outpatient visits to estimate overuse levels and variation. We coded FOBTs as overused if they were conducted <10 months after prior FOBT, <9.5 years after prior colonoscopy, or <4.5 years after prior barium enema. We used multinomial logistic regression models to examine variation in overuse by reason (sooner than recommended after prior FOBT; sooner than recommended after colonoscopy, barium enema, or a combination of procedures), adjusting for clustering of procedures within patients, and patients within facilities. KEY
RESULTS: Of 4,236 FOBTs received by participants, 885 (21 %) met overuse criteria, with 323 (8 %) sooner than recommended after FOBT, and 562 (13 %) sooner than recommended after other procedures. FOBT overuse varied across facilities (9-32 %, p<0.0001) and region (12-23 %, p< .0012). FOBT overuse after prior FOBT declined between 2003 and 2009 (8 %-5 %, p= .0492), but overuse after other procedures increased (11-19 %, p= .0002). FOBT overuse of both types increased with number of outpatient visits (OR 1.15, p<0.001), but did not vary by patient demographics. More than 11 % of overused FOBTs were followed by colonoscopy within 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Many FOBTs are performed sooner than recommended in the VHA. Variation in overuse by facility, region, and outpatient visits suggests addressing FOBT overuse will require system-level solutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22810358      PMCID: PMC3509310          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2163-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  42 in total

1.  Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system.

Authors:  Theodore R Levin; Wei Zhao; Carol Conell; Laura C Seeff; Diane L Manninen; Jean A Shapiro; Jane Schulman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  PSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectancies.

Authors:  Louise C Walter; Daniel Bertenthal; Karla Lindquist; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Validation of self-reported colorectal cancer screening behavior from a mixed-mode survey of veterans.

Authors:  Melissa R Partin; Joseph Grill; Siamak Noorbaloochi; Adam A Powell; Diana J Burgess; Sally W Vernon; Krysten Halek; Joan M Griffin; Michelle van Ryn; Deborah A Fisher
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.

Authors:  Bernard Levin; David A Lieberman; Beth McFarland; Kimberly S Andrews; Durado Brooks; John Bond; Chiranjeev Dash; Francis M Giardiello; Seth Glick; David Johnson; C Daniel Johnson; Theodore R Levin; Perry J Pickhardt; Douglas K Rex; Robert A Smith; Alan Thorson; Sidney J Winawer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Primary care practice organization influences colorectal cancer screening performance.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Yano; Lynn M Soban; Patricia H Parkerton; David A Etzioni
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Timing of repeat colonoscopy: disparity between guidelines and endoscopists' recommendation.

Authors:  Alex H Krist; Resa M Jones; Steven H Woolf; Sarah E Woessner; Daniel Merenstein; J William Kerns; Walter Foliaco; Paul Jackson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of 35 initiatives in 17 countries.

Authors:  Victoria S Benson; Julietta Patnick; Anna K Davies; Marion R Nadel; Robert A Smith; Wendy S Atkin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  The Charlson comorbidity index is adapted to predict costs of chronic disease in primary care patients.

Authors:  Mary E Charlson; Robert E Charlson; Janey C Peterson; Spyridon S Marinopoulos; William M Briggs; James P Hollenberg
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Impact of comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening in the veterans healthcare system.

Authors:  Deborah A Fisher; Joseph Galanko; Tara K Dudley; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 11.382

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Race/Ethnicity and overuse of care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy R Kressin; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Fecal occult blood test (FOBT) overuse.

Authors:  Daniel G Federman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Factors Associated With the Overuse of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Zachary Predmore; Jean Pannikottu; Ritu Sharma; Monica Tung; Stephanie Nothelle; Jodi B Segal
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Rates and correlates of potentially inappropriate colorectal cancer screening in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Adam A Powell; Sameer D Saini; Matthew K Breitenstein; Siamak Noorbaloochi; Andrea Cutting; Deborah A Fisher; Hanna E Bloomfield; Krysten Halek; Melissa R Partin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Underuse and Overuse of Colonoscopy for Repeat Screening and Surveillance in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Robert S Sandler; Janet M Grubber; Marcus R Johnson; Deborah A Fisher
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  Premature Fecal Immunochemical Testing in British Columbia Canada: a Retrospective Review of Physician and Screening Participant Characteristics.

Authors:  David Sanders; Brendan Bakos; Laura Gentile; Jennifer J Telford
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world.

Authors:  Shannon Brownlee; Kalipso Chalkidou; Jenny Doust; Adam G Elshaug; Paul Glasziou; Iona Heath; Somil Nagpal; Vikas Saini; Divya Srivastava; Kelsey Chalmers; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Underuse of surveillance colonoscopy in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Carmen L Lewis; Carol E Golin; Robert S Sandler
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 10.864

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.