Literature DB >> 15066356

Adherence with colorectal cancer screening guidelines: a review.

Sujha Subramanian1, Michelle Klosterman, Mayur M Amonkar, Timothy L Hunt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review screening rates and factors impacting patient utilization of colorectal cancer screening tests.
METHODS: We searched Medline, CancerLit, and PsycInfo for articles on colorectal cancer screening adherence. US studies on average-risk individuals were reviewed to identify: (1) utilization/adherence rates, (2) predictors of patient adherence, (3) correlation between long-term adherence and type of test selected, (4) predictors of physician recommendation of screening tests, and (5) patterns in the type of test recommended by physicians.
RESULTS: In 2000, only 34% of the US population obtained screening within recommended time frames (fecal occult blood test annually, flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years, or colonoscopy every 10 years). Positive attitude toward screening and physician recommendation result in high adherence while fear of finding cancer and the belief that cancer is fatal result in low adherence. Physician specialty impacts the type of test recommended, while perceived lack of patient adherence is not a consistent barrier to recommending screening tests. Matching individuals with their choice of screening test and newer technology, such as virtual colonoscopy, may help increase adherence.
CONCLUSION: Additional studies are required on differences in adherence between tests, whether patient preferences impact adherence, and how the physician-patient relationship can be fostered to increase adherence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15066356     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  99 in total

1.  The relationship of health numeracy to cancer screening.

Authors:  Marilyn M Schapira; Joan Neuner; Kathlyn E Fletcher; Mary Ann Gilligan; Elisabeth Hayes; Purushottam Laud
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual-level health behavior constructs and screening behavior.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Alyssa Bennett; Marie Zaiter; James R Marshall
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Uptake and positive predictive value of fecal occult blood tests: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jessica Chubak; Andy Bogart; Sharon Fuller; Sharon S Laing; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Rates and predictors of colorectal cancer screening by race among motivated men participating in a Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment Program.

Authors:  Michael J Hall; Karen Ruth; Veda N Giri
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Subjective and Objective Cancer Screening Knowledge Among White- and Blue-Collar Chinese Midlife Adults.

Authors:  Su-I Hou
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Patient perceptions of stool DNA testing for pan-digestive cancer screening: a survey questionnaire.

Authors:  Dennis Yang; Shauna L Hillman; Ann M Harris; Pamela S Sinicrope; Mary E Devens; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Acceptance of colonoscopy requires more than test tolerance.

Authors:  Amanda Condon; Lesley Graff; Lawrence Elliot; Alexandra Ilnyckyj
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.522

8.  Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians: recommendations and practices, 2006-2007.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; David Lanier; Marion R Nadel; Caroline McLeod; Gigi Yuan; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  A trial of 3 interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening in African Americans.

Authors:  Daniel S Blumenthal; Selina A Smith; Charlye D Majett; Ernest Alema-Mensah
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Potential Biases Introduced by Conflating Screening and Diagnostic Testing in Colorectal Cancer Screening Surveillance.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Becker; Derek M Griffith; Brady T West; Nancy K Janz; Ken Resnicow; Arden M Morris
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.