Literature DB >> 15124503

Primary care practice and facility quality orientation: influence on breast and cervical cancer screening rates.

Caroline Lubick Goldzweig1, Patricia H Parkerton, Donna L Washington, Andrew B Lanto, Elizabeth M Yano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of early cancer detection, variation in screening rates among physicians is high. Insights into factors influencing variation can guide efforts to decrease variation and increase screening rates.
OBJECTIVES: To explore the association of primary care practice features and a facility's quality orientation with breast and cervical cancer screening rates. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of screening rates among 144 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers and for a national sample of women.
METHODS: We linked practice structure and quality improvement characteristics of individual VA medical centers from 2 national surveys (1 to primary care directors and 1 to a stratified random sample of employees) to breast and cervical cancer screening rates determined from a review of random medical records. We conducted bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression of primary care practice and facility features on cancer screening rates, above and below the median.
RESULTS: While the national screening rates were high for breast (87%) and cervical cancer (90%), higher screening rates were more likely when primary care providers were consistently notified of specialty visits and when staff perceived a greater organizational commitment to quality and anticipated rewards and recognition for better performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Organization and quality orientation of the primary care practice and its facility can enhance breast and cervical cancer screening rates. Internal recognition of quality performance and an overall commitment to quality improvement may foster improved prevention performance, with impact varying by clinical service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15124503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  17 in total

Review 1.  The state of women veterans' health research. Results of a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Caroline L Goldzweig; Talene M Balekian; Cony Rolón; Elizabeth M Yano; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The evolution of changes in primary care delivery underlying the Veterans Health Administration's quality transformation.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Yano; Barbara F Simon; Andrew B Lanto; Lisa V Rubenstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The role of information technology in translating educational interventions into practice: an analysis using the PRECEDE/PROCEED model.

Authors:  Charlene Weir; Nanci McLeskey; Cherie Brunker; Denise Brooks; Mark A Supiano
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Pay-for-performance incentives for preventive care: views of family physicians before and after participation in a reminder and recall project (P-PROMPT).

Authors:  Janusz Kaczorowski; Orli Goldberg; Verna Mai
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Organizational factors and the cancer screening process.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price; Jane Zapka; Heather Edwards; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

6.  Improving rescreening in community clinics: does a system approach work?

Authors:  Regina Otero-Sabogal; Desi Owens; Jesse Canchola; Farzaneh Tabnak
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2006-12

7.  High-risk behavior and sexually transmitted infections among U.S. active duty servicewomen and veterans.

Authors:  Vinita Goyal; Kristin M Mattocks; Anne G Sadler
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Does Receiving Clinical Preventive Services Vary across Different Types of Primary Healthcare Organizations? Evidence from a Population-Based Survey.

Authors:  Sylvie Provost; Raynald Pineault; Jean-Frédéric Levesque; Stéphane Groulx; Geneviève Baron; Danièle Roberge; Marjolaine Hamel
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-11

9.  Primary care practice organization influences colorectal cancer screening performance.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Yano; Lynn M Soban; Patricia H Parkerton; David A Etzioni
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Physicians' beliefs about effectiveness of cancer screening tests: a national survey of family physicians, general internists, and obstetrician-gynecologists.

Authors:  Jacqueline W Miller; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Barbara Matthews; Katrina F Trivers; C Holly Andrilla; Denise Lishner; Barbara A Goff
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 4.018

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.