Literature DB >> 20512408

Misunderstandings concerning genetics among patients confronting genetic disease.

Robert L Klitzman1.   

Abstract

Critical questions arise about misunderstandings of genetics. We interviewed for 2 h each, 64 individuals who had or were at risk for Huntington's disease (HD), breast cancer or Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. These individuals revealed various misunderstandings that can affect coping, and testing, treatment and reproductive decisions. A therapeutic misconception about testing appeared: that testing would be helpful in and of itself. Many believed they could control genetic disorders (even HD), yet these beliefs were often incorrect, and could impede coping, testing, and treatment. Misunderstandings about statistics and genetics often fueled each other, and reflected denial, and desires for hope and control. Emotional needs can thus outweigh understandings of genetics and statistics, and providers' input. Individuals often maintained non-scientific beliefs, though embarrassed by these. These data have implications for care, and public and professional education. Misunderstandings' persistence, despite realization of their inaccuracy, suggests that providers need to address not just cognitive facts, but underlying emotional issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20512408      PMCID: PMC2945403          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-010-9307-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  31 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the literature exploring the role of primary care in genetic services.

Authors:  J Emery; E Watson; P Rose; A Andermann
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  Lay people's understanding of and preference against the word "mutation".

Authors:  Celeste M Condit; Tasha Dubriwny; John Lynch; Roxanne Parrott
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 3.  How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Glyn Elwyn; Clara L Gaff; Angus J Clarke; Rachel Iredale; Chris Shaw; Joanna Dundon; Hazel Thornton; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Information processing in the context of genetic risk: implications for genetic-risk communication.

Authors:  Holly Etchegary; Colin Perrier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  In search of cultural competence in psychotherapy and counseling.

Authors:  S Sue
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1998-04

6.  'Coming down the line'-- patients' understanding of their family history of common chronic disease.

Authors:  Fiona M Walter; Jon Emery
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum; L H Roth; C Lidz
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  1982

8.  Negotiating cross-cultural issues at the end of life: "You got to go where he lives".

Authors:  M Kagawa-Singer; L J Blackhall
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-12-19       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Australian study on public knowledge of human genetics and health.

Authors:  C Molster; T Charles; A Samanek; P O'Leary
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Disclosures of Huntington disease risk within families: patterns of decision-making and implications.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Deborah Thorne; Jennifer Williamson; Wendy Chung; Karen Marder
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.802

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Ethics and neuropsychiatric genetics: a review of major issues.

Authors:  Steven K Hoge; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.176

2.  "In sickness and in health"? Disclosures of genetic risks in dating.

Authors:  Robert L Klitzman; Meghan M Sweeney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  A Qualitative Look into Israeli Genetic Experts' Insights Regarding Culturally Competent Genetic Counseling and Recommendations for Its Enhancement.

Authors:  Merav Siani; Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Analysis of pre-test interviews in a cohort of Brazilian patients with movement disorders.

Authors:  Alice Salgueiro do Nascimento Marinho; Maria Angelica de Faria Domingues de Lima; Fernando Regla Vargas
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-05-21

5.  Recognizing BRCA gene mutation risk subsequent to breast cancer diagnosis in southwestern Ontario.

Authors:  Meredith Vanstone; Winsion Chow; Laura Lester; Peter Ainsworth; Jeff Nisker; Muriel Brackstone
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Perceptions and Attitudes About Genetic Counseling Among Residents of a Midwestern Rural Area.

Authors:  Rachel J Riesgraf; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Ian M MacFarlane; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Communication about Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: Perspective of Filipino Families.

Authors:  Peter James B Abad; Cora A Anonuevo; Sandra Daack-Hirsch; Lorna R Abad; Carmencita D Padilla; Mercy Y Laurino
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  The Influence of Adolescence on Parents' Perspectives of Testing and Discussing Inherited Cancer Predisposition.

Authors:  Corinna L Schultz; Melissa A Alderfer; Robert B Lindell; Zachary McClain; Kristin Zelley; Kim E Nichols; Carol A Ford
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  A Qualitative Study of Anticipated Decision Making around Type 2 Diabetes Genetic Testing: the Role of Scientifically Concordant and Discordant Expectations.

Authors:  Alicia G Carmichael; Bailey B Hulswit; Emily J Moe; Toby Epstein Jayaratne; Beverly M Yashar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  "Is it really worth it to get tested?": primary care patients' impressions of predictive SNP testing for colon cancer.

Authors:  Kara-Grace Leventhal; William Tuong; Beth N Peshkin; Yasmin Salehizadeh; Mary B Fishman; Susan Eggly; Kevin FitzGerald; Marc D Schwartz; Kristi D Graves
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.