Literature DB >> 19048344

Sensitivity to interaural time differences with combined cochlear implant and acoustic stimulation.

Tom Francart1, Jan Brokx, Jan Wouters.   

Abstract

The interaural time difference (ITD) is an important cue to localize sound sources. Sensitivity to ITD was measured in eight users of a cochlear implant (CI) in the one ear and a hearing aid (HA) in the other severely impaired ear. The stimulus consisted of an electric pulse train of 100 pps and an acoustic filtered click train. Just-noticeable differences (JNDs) in ITD were measured using a lateralization paradigm. Four subjects exhibited median JNDs in ITD of 156, 341, 254, and 91 mus; the other subjects could not lateralize the stimuli consistently. Only the subjects who could lateralize had average acoustic hearing thresholds at 1,000 and 2,000 Hz better than 100-dB SPL. The electric signal had to be delayed by 1.5 ms to achieve synchronous stimulation at the auditory nerves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19048344      PMCID: PMC2644391          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-008-0145-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  26 in total

1.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

2.  Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Donald K Eddington; H Steven Colburn; William M Rabinowitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Sensitivity to interaural level difference and loudness growth with bilateral bimodal stimulation.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Jan Brokx; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  The interaural time jnd as a simultaneous function of interaural time and interaural amplitude.

Authors:  R Domnitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Detectability of interaural delay in high-frequency complex waveforms.

Authors:  G B Henning
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Discriminations of interaural phase differences.

Authors:  W A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Binaural interaction in low-frequency stimuli: the inability to trade time and intensity completely.

Authors:  E R Hafter; S C Carrier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Lateralization of filtered clicks.

Authors:  W A Yost; F L Wightman; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  19 in total

1.  Interaural Pitch-Discrimination Range Effects for Bilateral and Single-Sided-Deafness Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Stefano Cosentino; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-08

2.  Electrically evoked auditory steady state responses in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Michael Hofmann; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-22

3.  Binaural advantages in users of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant devices.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Natalie Pak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Interaural Time Difference Perception with a Cochlear Implant and a Normal Ear.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Konstantin Wiebe; Thomas Wesarg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-09-27

5.  Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners' Ability to Perceive Minimal Audible Angle Differences.

Authors:  Ashley Zaleski-King; Matthew J Goupell; Dragana Barac-Cikoja; Matthew Bakke
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Mechanisms of Localization and Speech Perception with Colocated and Spatially Separated Noise and Speech Maskers Under Single-Sided Deafness with a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Coral Dirks; Peggy B Nelson; Douglas P Sladen; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  [Speech perception with electric-acoustic stimulation : Comparison with bilateral cochlear implant users in different noise conditions].

Authors:  T Rader
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Effects of insertion depth on spatial speech perception in noise for simulations of cochlear implants and single-sided deafness.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Zhou; Huajun Li; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Wei Yuan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Modulation enhancement in the electrical signal improves perception of interaural time differences with bimodal stimulation.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Anneke Lenssen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-03

10.  Speech perception and localisation with SCORE bimodal: a loudness normalisation strategy for combined cochlear implant and hearing aid stimulation.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Hugh McDermott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.