Literature DB >> 15912874

Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search.

Jason J Braithwaite1, Glyn W Humphreys, Johan Hulleman.   

Abstract

In four experiments, we examined selection processes in visual search using a probe detection task to measure the allocation of attention. Under preview search conditions, probes were harder to detect on old relative to new distractors (Experiment 1). This cannot be attributed solely to low-level sensory factors (Experiment 2). In addition, probe detection was sensitive to color-based grouping of old distractors and to color similarity between old distractors (Experiments 3 and 4). These effects were dissociated when the color of the old distractors changed but probe detection effects remained. Collectively, the data indicate both group-based suppression of distractors and the separate inhibition of distractor features in search.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15912874     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  10 in total

1.  Eye movements and time-based selection: where do the eyes go in preview search?

Authors:  Derrick G Watson; Matthew Inglis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

2.  Differential age-related changes in localizing a target among distractors across an extended visual field.

Authors:  Jing Feng; Fergus I M Craik; Brian Levine; Sylvain Moreno; Gary Naglie; HeeSun Choi
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2016-10-11

3.  Signal enhancement and suppression during visual-spatial selective attention.

Authors:  J W Couperus; G R Mangun
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search?

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Cortical Mechanisms of Prioritizing Selection for Rejection in Visual Search.

Authors:  Sarah E Donohue; Mandy V Bartsch; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Mircea A Schoenfeld; Jens-Max Hopf
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Interaction between object-based attention and pertinence values shapes the attentional priority map of a multielement display.

Authors:  Celine R Gillebert; Anders Petersen; Chayenne Van Meel; Tanja Müller; Alexandra McIntyre; Johan Wagemans; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  A Drastic Change in Background Luminance or Motion Degrades the Preview Benefit.

Authors:  Takayuki Osugi; Ikuya Murakami
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-24

8.  Attentional Capture to a Singleton Distractor Degrades Visual Marking in Visual Search.

Authors:  Kenji Yamauchi; Takayuki Osugi; Ikuya Murakami
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-16

9.  Parallel distractor rejection as a binding mechanism in search.

Authors:  Kevin Dent; Harriet A Allen; Jason J Braithwaite; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-09

10.  Subset selective search on the basis of color and preview.

Authors:  Mieke Donk
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.199

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.