Literature DB >> 17467921

Craniospinal irradiation with spinal IMRT to improve target homogeneity.

Atmaram Pai Panandiker1, Holly Ning, Anna Likhacheva, Karen Ullman, Barbara Arora, John Ondos, Shervin Karimpour, Roger Packer, Robert Miller, Deborah Citrin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report a new technique for the spinal component of craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in the supine position, to describe a verification procedure for this method, and to compare this technique with conventional plans. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twelve patients were treated between 1998 and 2006 with CSI using a novel technique. Sixteen children were treated with a conventional field arrangement. All patients were followed for outcomes and toxicity. CSI was delivered using a posteroanterior (PA) intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) spinal field matched to conventional, opposed lateral cranial fields. Treatment plans were generated for each patient using the IMRT technique and a standard PA field technique. The resulting dosimetry was compared to determine target homogeneity, maximum dose to normal tissues, and total monitor units delivered.
RESULTS: Evaluation of the spinal IMRT technique compared with a standard PA technique reveals a 7% reduction in the target volume receiving > or =110% of the prescribed dose and an 8% increase in the target volume receiving > or =95% of the prescribed dose. Although target homogeneity was improved, the maximum dose delivered in the paraspinal muscles was increased by approximately 8.5% with spinal IMRT compared to the PA technique. Follow-up evaluations revealed no unexpected toxicity associated with the IMRT technique.
CONCLUSIONS: A new technique of spine IMRT is presented in combination with a quality assurance method. This method improves target dose uniformity compared to the conventional CSI technique. Longer follow-up will be required to determine any benefit with regard to toxicity and disease control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17467921      PMCID: PMC1994073          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  16 in total

1.  A simple method of radiation treatment of craniospinal fields with patient supine.

Authors:  R B Hawkins
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Helical tomotherapy for craniospinal radiation.

Authors:  G Bauman; S Yartsev; T Coad; B Fisher; T Kron
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Treatment planning with protons for pediatric retinoblastoma, medulloblastoma, and pelvic sarcoma: how do protons compare with other conformal techniques?

Authors:  Catherine T Lee; Stephen D Bilton; Robin M Famiglietti; Beverly A Riley; Anita Mahajan; Eric L Chang; Moshe H Maor; Shiao Y Woo; James D Cox; Alfred R Smith
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Long-term intellectual outcome in children with posterior fossa tumors according to radiation doses and volumes.

Authors:  J Grill; V K Renaux; C Bulteau; D Viguier; C Levy-Piebois; C Sainte-Rose; G Dellatolas; M A Raquin; I Jambaqué; C Kalifa
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 5.  Skeletal complications in pediatric oncology patients.

Authors:  D J Roebuck
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Reducing toxicity from craniospinal irradiation: using proton beams to treat medulloblastoma in young children.

Authors:  Grace E Yuh; Lilia N Loredo; Leslie T Yonemoto; David A Bush; Kambiz Shahnazi; William Preston; James M Slater; Jerry D Slater
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 7.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, protons, and the risk of second cancers.

Authors:  Eric J Hall
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  Craniospinal treatment with the patient supine.

Authors:  Bruce Thomadsen; Minesh Mehta; Steven Howard; Rupak Das
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.482

9.  Current calibration, treatment, and treatment planning techniques among institutions participating in the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Marcia Urie; T J FitzGerald; David Followill; Fran Laurie; Robert Marcus; Jeff Michalski
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Method to plan, administer, and verify supine craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Jeff M Michalski; Eric E Klein; Russell Gerber
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  16 in total

1.  High-precision radiotherapy for craniospinal irradiation: evaluation of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy and helical TomoTherapy.

Authors:  D S Sharma; T Gupta; R Jalali; Z Master; R D Phurailatpam; R Sarin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Endocrine outcomes with proton and photon radiotherapy for standard risk medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Bree R Eaton; Natia Esiashvili; Sungjin Kim; Briana Patterson; Elizabeth A Weyman; Lauren T Thornton; Claire Mazewski; Tobey J MacDonald; David Ebb; Shannon M MacDonald; Nancy J Tarbell; Torunn I Yock
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 3.  Medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Nathan E Millard; Kevin C De Braganca
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 1.987

4.  Clinical Outcomes Among Children With Standard-Risk Medulloblastoma Treated With Proton and Photon Radiation Therapy: A Comparison of Disease Control and Overall Survival.

Authors:  Bree R Eaton; Natia Esiashvili; Sungjin Kim; Elizabeth A Weyman; Lauren T Thornton; Claire Mazewski; Tobey MacDonald; David Ebb; Shannon M MacDonald; Nancy J Tarbell; Torunn I Yock
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Craniospinal radiotherapy in children: Electron- or photon-based technique of spinal irradiation.

Authors:  Marzanna Chojnacka; Anna Skowrońska-Gardas; Marzena Morawska-Kaczyńska; Anna Zygmuntowicz-Piętka; Katarzyna Pędziwiatr; Anna Semaniak
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2010-02-18

6.  An image-guided technique for planning and verification of supine craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Ryan L McMahon; Nicole A Larrier; Q Jackie Wu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  A new strategy for craniospinal axis localization and adaptive dosimetric evaluation using cone beam CT.

Authors:  Kather Hussain Mohamathu Rafic; Christopher Sujith; Balakrishnan Rajesh; Ebenezer Suman Babu S; Peace Balasingh Timothy; B Selvamani; Paul B Ravindran
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-12-10

8.  Intellectual functioning among case-matched cohorts of children treated with proton or photon radiation for standard-risk medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Bree R Eaton; Grace W Fong; Lisa M Ingerski; Margaret B Pulsifer; Subir Goyal; Chao Zhang; Elizabeth A Weyman; Natia Esiashvili; James L Klosky; Tobey J MacDonald; David H Ebb; Shannon M MacDonald; Nancy J Tarbell; Torunn I Yock
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 6.921

9.  A simple approach of three-isocenter IMRT planning for craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Wei Jiang; Yuanming Feng; Yang Guo; Zheng Cong; Bin Song; Yu Guo
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Acute toxicity profile of craniospinal irradiation with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in children with medulloblastoma: A prospective analysis.

Authors:  Maurice C Cox; Johannes M Kusters; Corrie E Gidding; Jolanda H Schieving; Erik J van Lindert; Johannes H Kaanders; Geert O Janssens
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.