Literature DB >> 19581313

High-precision radiotherapy for craniospinal irradiation: evaluation of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy and helical TomoTherapy.

D S Sharma1, T Gupta, R Jalali, Z Master, R D Phurailatpam, R Sarin.   

Abstract

This study aimed to establish the feasibility of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in craniospinal irradiation (CSI) using conventional linear accelerator (IMRT_LA) and compare it dosimetrically with helical TomoTherapy (IMRT_Tomo) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). CT datasets of four previously treated patients with medulloblastoma were used to generate 3DCRT, IMRT_LA and IMRT_Tomo plans. A CSI dose of 35 Gy was prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV). IMRT_LA plans for tall patients were generated using an intensity feathering technique. All plans were compared dosimetrically using standardised parameters. The mean volume of each PTV receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose (V(95%)) was >98% for all plans. All plans resulted in a comparable dose homogeneity index (DHI) for PTV_brain. For PTV_spine, IMRT_Tomo achieved the highest mean DHI of 0.96, compared with 0.91 for IMRT_LA and 0.84 for 3DCRT. The best dose conformity index was achieved by IMRT_Tomo for PTV_brain (0.96) and IMRT_LA for PTV_spine (0.83). The IMRT_Tomo plan was superior in terms of reduction of the maximum, mean and integral doses to almost all organs at risk (OARs). It also reduced the volume of each OAR irradiated to various dose levels, except for the lowest dose volume. The beam-on time was significantly longer in IMRT_Tomo. In conclusion, IMRT_Tomo for CSI is technically easier and potentially dosimetrically favourable compared with IMRT_LA and 3DCRT. IMRT for CSI can also be realised on a conventional linear accelerator even for spinal lengths exceeding maximum allowable field sizes. The longer beam-on time in IMRT_Tomo raises concerns about intrafraction motion and whole-body integral doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19581313      PMCID: PMC3473394          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/13776022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  28 in total

1.  Helical tomotherapy for craniospinal radiation.

Authors:  G Bauman; S Yartsev; T Coad; B Fisher; T Kron
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Feasibility of cranio-spinal axis radiation with the Hi-Art tomotherapy system.

Authors:  José A Peñagarícano; Nikos Papanikolaou; Yulong Yan; Emad Youssef; Vaneerat Ratanatharathorn
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Whole-body dose from tomotherapy delivery.

Authors:  S Mutic; D A Low
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Evaluation of integral dose in cranio-spinal axis (CSA) irradiation with conventional and helical delivery.

Authors:  José A Peñagarícano; Chengyu Shi; Vancerat Ratanatharathorn
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-12

5.  The calculated risk of fatal secondary malignancies from intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Stephen F Kry; Mohammad Salehpour; David S Followill; Marilyn Stovall; Deborah A Kuban; R Allen White; Isaac I Rosen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Generation of arbitrary intensity profiles by dynamic jaws or multileaf collimators.

Authors:  S V Spirou; C S Chui
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A simple technique for craniospinal radiotherapy in the supine position.

Authors:  William A Parker; Carolyn R Freeman
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 8.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of pediatric cancer patients.

Authors:  Agata Rembielak; Tony Choon Seng Woo
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol       Date:  2005-04

9.  Computed tomographic simulation of craniospinal fields in pediatric patients: improved treatment accuracy and patient comfort.

Authors:  K Mah; C E Danjoux; S Manship; N Makhani; M Cardoso; K E Sixel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  Radiation-induced second cancers: the impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT.

Authors:  Eric J Hall; Cheng-Shie Wuu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  29 in total

1.  A comparative study on the risks of radiogenic second cancers and cardiac mortality in a set of pediatric medulloblastoma patients treated with photon or proton craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Rebecca M Howell; Phillip J Taddei; Annelise Giebeler; Anita Mahajan; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA) MRI to investigate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) within dural reflections of posterior fossa cranial nerves.

Authors:  David J Noble; Daniel Scoffings; Thankamma Ajithkumar; Michael V Williams; Sarah J Jefferies
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  The role of radiotherapy in adult medulloblastoma: long-term single-institution experience and a review of the literature.

Authors:  M Balducci; S Chiesa; D Chieffo; S Manfrida; N Dinapoli; A Fiorentino; F Miccichè; V Frascino; C Anile; V Valentini; B De Bari
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  A novel inverse optimization based three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique in craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Fatih Biltekin; Gozde Yazici; Gokhan Ozyigit
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2021-02-08

5.  Clinical analysis of intracranial germinoma's craniospinal irradiation using helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Baolin Qu; Lei Du; Yurong Huang; Wei Yu; Boning Cai; Shouping Xu; Lin Ma
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  A novel supine isocentric approach for craniospinal irradiation and its clinical outcome.

Authors:  Yi-Kan Cheng; Lei Zeng; Shu-Biao Ye; Jian Zheng; Lin Zhang; Peng Sun; Xiao-Bo Jiang; Wen-Zhao Sun; Tao Xu; Lei Chen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Outcome and toxicity using helical tomotherapy for craniospinal irradiation in pediatric medulloblastoma.

Authors:  J L Lopez Guerra; I Marrone; J Jaen; M Bruna; C Sole; A Sanchez-Reyes; E Rivin; M J Ortiz; F Calvo; R Matute
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Accelerated partial breast irradiation using external beam radiotherapy-A feasibility study based on dosimetric analysis.

Authors:  Surega Anbumani; Siddanna R Palled; Girish S Prabhakar; N Arunai Nambiraj; Anchineyan Pichandi
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-06-15

9.  Estimation of radiation-induced second cancer risk associated with the institutional field matching craniospinal irradiation technique: A comparative treatment planning study.

Authors:  Hemalatha Athiyaman; Athiyaman Mayilvaganan; Arun Chougule; Mary Joan; Harvinder Singh Kumar
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-07-08

Review 10.  Cardiotoxicity of mediastinal radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ivica Ratosa; Maja Ivanetic Pantar
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-10-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.