Bree R Eaton1, Grace W Fong2, Lisa M Ingerski3,4, Margaret B Pulsifer5, Subir Goyal6, Chao Zhang6, Elizabeth A Weyman7, Natia Esiashvili1, James L Klosky3,4, Tobey J MacDonald3,4, David H Ebb8, Shannon M MacDonald6, Nancy J Tarbell6, Torunn I Yock6. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 2. Department of Psychology, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 4. Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia. 5. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 8. Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Proton therapy may reduce cognitive deficits after radiotherapy among brain tumor survivors, although current data are limited to retrospective comparisons between historical cohorts. The authors compared intelligence quotient scores within a case-matched cohort of children with medulloblastoma treated with proton radiation (PRT) or photon radiation (XRT) over the same time period. METHODS: Among 88 consecutive patients with standard-risk medulloblastoma treated with PRT or XRT at 2 institutions from 2000 to 2009, 50 were matched 1:1 (25 with PRT and 25 with XRT) according to age, gender, date of diagnosis, histology, radiation boost, and craniospinal irradiation dose. One-way analyses of variance were performed to compare the Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ) and associated index scores between the 2 cohorts. RESULTS: Neurocognitive data were available for 37 survivors (17 with PRT and 20 with XRT) from the matched cohort. The mean age was 8.5 years (SD, 4.14 years). The median follow-up was 5.3 years (range, 1.0-11.4 years) and 4.6 years (range, 1.1-11.2 years) for the PRT and XRT cohorts, respectively (P = .193). Patients treated with PRT had significantly higher mean FSIQ (99.6 vs 86.2; P = .021), verbal (105.2 vs 88.6; P = .010), and nonverbal scores (103.1 vs 88.9; P = .011) than the XRT-treated cohort. Differences in processing speed (82.9 vs 77.2; P = .331) and working memory (97.0 vs 92.7; P = .388) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy-associated cognitive effects appear to be more attenuated after proton therapy. Comprehensive prospective studies are needed to appropriately evaluate the neurocognitive advantages of proton therapy.
BACKGROUND: Proton therapy may reduce cognitive deficits after radiotherapy among brain tumor survivors, although current data are limited to retrospective comparisons between historical cohorts. The authors compared intelligence quotient scores within a case-matched cohort of children with medulloblastoma treated with proton radiation (PRT) or photon radiation (XRT) over the same time period. METHODS: Among 88 consecutive patients with standard-risk medulloblastoma treated with PRT or XRT at 2 institutions from 2000 to 2009, 50 were matched 1:1 (25 with PRT and 25 with XRT) according to age, gender, date of diagnosis, histology, radiation boost, and craniospinal irradiation dose. One-way analyses of variance were performed to compare the Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ) and associated index scores between the 2 cohorts. RESULTS: Neurocognitive data were available for 37 survivors (17 with PRT and 20 with XRT) from the matched cohort. The mean age was 8.5 years (SD, 4.14 years). The median follow-up was 5.3 years (range, 1.0-11.4 years) and 4.6 years (range, 1.1-11.2 years) for the PRT and XRT cohorts, respectively (P = .193). Patients treated with PRT had significantly higher mean FSIQ (99.6 vs 86.2; P = .021), verbal (105.2 vs 88.6; P = .010), and nonverbal scores (103.1 vs 88.9; P = .011) than the XRT-treated cohort. Differences in processing speed (82.9 vs 77.2; P = .331) and working memory (97.0 vs 92.7; P = .388) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy-associated cognitive effects appear to be more attenuated after proton therapy. Comprehensive prospective studies are needed to appropriately evaluate the neurocognitive advantages of proton therapy.
Authors: Raymond K Mulhern; Shawna L Palmer; Thomas E Merchant; Dana Wallace; Mehmet Kocak; Pim Brouwers; Kevin Krull; Murali Chintagumpala; Robyn Stargatt; David M Ashley; Vida L Tyc; Larry Kun; James Boyett; Amar Gajjar Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-08-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thomas E Merchant; Erin N Kiehna; Chenghong Li; Xiaoping Xiong; Raymond K Mulhern Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-08-22 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Lisa S Kahalley; Rachel Peterson; M Douglas Ris; Laura Janzen; M Fatih Okcu; David R Grosshans; Vijay Ramaswamy; Arnold C Paulino; David Hodgson; Anita Mahajan; Derek S Tsang; Normand Laperriere; William E Whitehead; Robert C Dauser; Michael D Taylor; Heather M Conklin; Murali Chintagumpala; Eric Bouffet; Donald Mabbott Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Claire Alapetite; Herve Brisse; Catherine Patte; Marie Anne Raquin; Genevieve Gaboriaud; Christian Carrie; Jean Louis Habrand; Philippe Thiesse; Jean Claude Cuilliere; Valerie Bernier; M Ben-Hassel; Didier Frappaz; Marie Christine Baranzelli; Eric Bouffet Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2010-08-17 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Atmaram Pai Panandiker; Holly Ning; Anna Likhacheva; Karen Ullman; Barbara Arora; John Ondos; Shervin Karimpour; Roger Packer; Robert Miller; Deborah Citrin Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-04-30 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Torunn I Yock; Sundeep Bhat; Jackie Szymonifka; Beow Y Yeap; Jennifer Delahaye; Sarah S Donaldson; Shannon M MacDonald; Margaret B Pulsifer; Kristen S Hill; Thomas F DeLaney; David Ebb; Mary Huang; Nancy J Tarbell; Paul Graham Fisher; Karen A Kuhlthau Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2014-10-07 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Gregory T Armstrong; Qi Liu; Yutaka Yasui; Sujuan Huang; Kirsten K Ness; Wendy Leisenring; Melissa M Hudson; Sarah S Donaldson; Allison A King; Marilyn Stovall; Kevin R Krull; Leslie L Robison; Roger J Packer Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2009-06-17 Impact factor: 11.816
Authors: Michael T Williams; Chiho Sugimoto; Samantha L Regan; Emily M Pitzer; Adam L Fritz; Mathieu Sertorio; Anthony E Mascia; Ralph E Vatner; John P Perentesis; Charles V Vorhees Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-09-16 Impact factor: 3.752