Literature DB >> 18587624

Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty?

Florian D Naal1, Franco M Impellizzeri, Michael Leunig.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We compared the metric properties of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale, the Tegner score, and the Activity Rating Scale for assessment of activity levels in 105 patients undergoing THA (48 women; mean age, 63.4 years) and 100 patients undergoing TKA (61 women; mean age, 66.5 years). We assessed construct validity by correlating these scales with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and different traditional patient self-reporting outcome measures. Test-retest reliability, feasibility, and floor and ceiling effects also were determined. The UCLA scale showed the strongest correlations with the other measures (r = -0.35 to 0.56 for THA; r = -0.55 to 0.23 for TKA) and was the only scale that discriminated between insufficiently and sufficiently active patients undergoing THA and TKA. The UCLA scale had the best reliability, provided the highest completion rate, and showed no floor effects. It seems to be the most appropriate scale for assessment of physical activity levels in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18587624      PMCID: PMC2650053          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0358-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  40 in total

1.  The need to account for patient activity when evaluating the results of total hip arthroplasty with survivorship analysis.

Authors:  Frederick J Dorey; Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Using different physical activity measurements in eight European countries. Results of the European Physical Activity Surveillance System (EUPASS) time series survey.

Authors:  A Rütten; H Ziemainz; F Schena; T Stahl; M Stiggelbout; Y Vanden Auweele; A Vuillemin; J Welshman
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  Addressing overreporting on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) telephone survey with a population sample.

Authors:  Randy Rzewnicki; Yves Vanden Auweele; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 4.  Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Tennis after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; Amar D Rajadhyaksha; Jeff L Marxen; Charles E Silberstein; David S Hungerford
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee.

Authors:  R G Marx; T J Stump; E C Jones; T L Wickiewicz; R F Warren
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 8.  Athletic activity after joint replacement.

Authors:  W L Healy; R Iorio; M J Lemos
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Patients' expectations of knee surgery.

Authors:  C A Mancuso; T P Sculco; T L Wickiewicz; E C Jones; L Robbins; R F Warren; P Williams-Russo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The John Charnley Award. Wear is a function of use, not time.

Authors:  T P Schmalzried; E F Shepherd; F J Dorey; W O Jackson; M dela Rosa; F Fa'vae; H A McKellop; C D McClung; J Martell; J R Moreland; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  89 in total

1.  High revision rate at 5 years after hip resurfacing with the Durom implant.

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Ronny Pilz; Urs Munzinger; Otmar Hersche; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  What is the evidence for total knee arthroplasty in young patients?: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  James A Keeney; Selena Eunice; Gail Pashos; Rick W Wright; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Sporting and physical activity following hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Noel E Fisher; Vijay V Killampalli; Rakesh K Kundra; Nikolas A Jagodzinski; Keshav Mathur; Alex D Reading
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Surgical technique: Second-generation bone marrow stimulation via surgical dislocation to treat hip cartilage lesions.

Authors:  Michael Leunig; Lisa M Tibor; Florian D Naal; Reinhold Ganz; Matthias R Steinwachs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Outcome of peri-acetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia in teenagers.

Authors:  Tetsuya Sakamoto; Masatoshi Naito; Yoshinari Nakamura
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  What Preoperative Factors are Associated With Not Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference After THA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Pakdee Rojanasopondist; Vincent P Galea; James W Connelly; Sean J Matuszak; Ola Rolfson; Charles R Bragdon; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Comparative retrospective study of the direct anterior and transgluteal approaches for primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Johannes C Reichert; Maximilian R Volkmann; Maximilian Koppmair; Lars Rackwitz; Martin Lüdemann; Maximilian Rudert; Ulrich Nöth
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  The epidemiology and functional outcomes of operative fixation of extracapsular proximal femoral fractures (AO 31-A) in young adults.

Authors:  D N Ramoutar; P Kodumuri; J N Rodrigues; S Olewicz; C G Moran; B J Ollivere; D P Forward
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-12-07

9.  No difference between double-high insert and medial-pivot insert in TKA.

Authors:  Kazunari Ishida; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Nobuhiro Tsumura; Takashi Iwakura; Seiji Kubo; Tetsuhiro Iguchi; Toshihiro Akisue; Kotaro Nishida; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  No differences in outcomes between cemented and uncemented acetabular components after 12-14 years: results from a randomized controlled trial comparing Duraloc with Charnley cups.

Authors:  Kristian Bjørgul; Wendy M Novicoff; S T Andersen; K Brevig; F Thu; M Wiig; O Ahlund
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-03-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.