Literature DB >> 17444165

Early results of Bentall-type operations during the last 10 years: comparison of mechanical valves and stentless bioprostheses.

Koki Nakamura1, Tomohiro Asai, Mikiko Murakami, Yosuke Saitoh, Hiroki Yamaguchi.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVE. Various types of prostheses have been used for combined diseases of the aortic root and ascending aorta.
METHODS: All Bentall-type operations (n=64) between 1996 and 2005 were retrospectively studied, comparing different types of prosthesis in the aortic position. The patients were 29-87 years old (mean 59.5 +/- 14.0 years) and included 47 men and 17 women. Mechanical valves, stentless bioprostheses (Freestyle), stented bioprostheses, and a homograft were used in 31, 29, 3, and I patients, respectively. Early results, especially hemodynamics, were analyzed among two groups: mechanical valve group (M-group) and Freestyle group (F-group).
RESULTS: The average age was significantly higher in the F-group (62.8 +/- 12.7 years) than in the M-group (54.9 +/- 14.0 years) (P = 0.025). The implanted valve was significantly larger in the F-group (26.0 +/- 2.3 mm) than in the M-group (23.5 +/- 2.1mm) (P = 0.000). The estimated effective orifice area of the prosthesis was significantly larger in the F-group (2.23 +/- 0.38 cm2) than in the M-group (1.84 +/- 0.49 cm2) (P = 0.001). The pressure gradient across the prosthesis was significantly lower in the F-group (18.6 +/- 5.5 mmHg) than in the M-group (25.4 +/- 7.6 mmHg) (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The Bentall-type procedure using the Freestyle valve has an advantage regarding hemodynamics compared to the procedure employing mechanical prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17444165     DOI: 10.1007/s11748-006-0061-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1863-6705


  19 in total

1.  Replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta with a valved stentless composite graft: technical considerations and early clinical results.

Authors:  P P Urbanski; R W Hacker
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Composite stentless valve with graft extension for combined replacement of the aortic valve, root and ascending aorta.

Authors:  J G Byrne; T Mihaljevic; W E Lipson; B Smith; J A Fox; S F Aranki
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  Biological vs. mechanical aortic root replacement.

Authors:  John G Byrne; Tomas Gudbjartsson; Alexandros N Karavas; Tomislav Mihaljevic; Bradley J Phillips; Sary F Aranki; James D Rawn; Lawrence H Cohn
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 4.  Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention.

Authors:  P Pibarot; J G Dumesnil
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Suitability of stentless bioprostheses for combined replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta.

Authors:  Stefano Auriemma; Uberto Bortolotti; Caterina Piccin; Massimo Brunelli; Paolo Magagna; Nicola Lamascese; Mariemma Paccanaro; Alessandro Fabbri
Journal:  Ital Heart J       Date:  2004-09

6.  Hemodynamic features of the freestyle aortic bioprosthesis compared with stented bioprosthesis.

Authors:  J G Dumesnil; M H LeBlanc; P C Cartier; J Métras; D Desaulniers; D P Doyle; M D Lemieux; G Raymond
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Hemodynamics and early performance of the St. Jude Medical Regent aortic valve prosthesis.

Authors:  D S Bach; M Goldbach; M P Sakwa; M Petracek; L Errett; F Mohr
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2001-07

8.  Aortic valve replacement with Medtronic Freestyle bioprosthesis: 5-year results.

Authors:  D B Doty; A Cafferty; P Cartier; H A Huysmans; N D Kon; A H Krause; R C Millar; C F Sintek; S Westaby
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1999-10

9.  Eight-year results of aortic root replacement with the freestyle stentless porcine aortic root bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Neal D Kon; Robert D Riley; Sandy M Adair; Dalane W Kitzman; A Robert Cordell
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Mass regression in aortic stenosis after valve replacement with small size pericardial bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Giordano Tasca; Federico Brunelli; Marco Cirillo; Andrea Amaducci; Zen Mhagna; Giovanni Troise; Eugenio Quaini
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  1 in total

1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of mechanical vs biological composite aortic root replacement, early and 1-year results.

Authors:  Mohamad Bashir; Amer Harky; Saied Froghi; Benjamin Adams; Megan Garner; Prity Gupta; Aung Oo; Rakesh Uppal
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-10-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.