Literature DB >> 11499586

Hemodynamics and early performance of the St. Jude Medical Regent aortic valve prosthesis.

D S Bach1, M Goldbach, M P Sakwa, M Petracek, L Errett, F Mohr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The St. Jude Medical (SJM) Regent heart valve is a new bileaflet prosthetic valve modified from the currently marketed SJM mechanical valve, with a modified external profile that results in a larger geometric orifice area without changing the existing design of the pivot mechanism or blood contact surface areas. The aim of the present study was to report the early hemodynamic and clinical results of an on-going multicenter trial investigating the clinical performance of the Regent mechanical aortic valve prosthesis.
METHODS: The early results from 204 patients at 11 centers in North America and Europe who underwent implantation of a Regent mechanical aortic valve prosthesis are described. Clinical status was prospectively recorded, and echocardiography with Doppler performed at hospital discharge, and at two and six months and one year postoperatively.
RESULTS: Follow up to date is 109.3 patient-years (average follow up 0.5+/-0.4 years per patient; range: 0 to 1.7 years). NYHA class improved for the group, and there were low rates of clinical adverse effects. Echocardiographic mean pressure gradient at six months was 13.8+/-10.3, 7.4+/-4.1, 5.4+/-3.2, 5.2+/-2.8, 3.4+/-2.3 and 3.6 mmHg, respectively, for 19, 21, 23, 25, 27 and 29 mm valves; effective orifice area was 1.5+/-0.6, 2.0+/-0.7, 2.4+/-1.0, 2.5+/-0.7, 3.6+/-1.4 and 4.8 cm2, respectively. There was a statistically significant decrease in left ventricular mass index between early postoperative (169.1+/-57.7 g/m2) and six months follow up (137.2+/-42.7 g/m2, delta = -30.1+/-42.5 g/m2, p <0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The SJM Regent aortic valve has excellent associated hemodynamics with rapid and significant left ventricular mass regression. In all cases of adverse events, rates fell within Objective Performance Criteria guidelines. Long-term clinical assessment is on-going.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11499586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis        ISSN: 0966-8519


  8 in total

1.  Clinical and echocardiographic assessment of the Medtronic Advantage aortic valve prosthesis: the Scandinavian multicentre, prospective study.

Authors:  Rune Haaverstad; Nicola Vitale; Asbjørn Karevold; Giangiuseppe Cappabianca; Arve Tromsdal; Peter Skov Olsen; Lars Köber; Halfdan Ihlen; Kjell Arne Rein; Jan L Svennevig
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Aortic valve replacement with 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent prosthetic valves for a small calcified aortic annulus in elderly patients.

Authors:  Shinichiro Taniguchi; Manabu Noguchi; Daisuke Onohara; Ryuichiro Shibata
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-10-13

3.  Effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on survival after aortic valve replacement using mechanical prostheses in patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Koji Tsutsumi; Masashi Nagumo; Kuni Nishikawa; Ryuichi Takahashi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-12-16

4.  Early results of Bentall-type operations during the last 10 years: comparison of mechanical valves and stentless bioprostheses.

Authors:  Koki Nakamura; Tomohiro Asai; Mikiko Murakami; Yosuke Saitoh; Hiroki Yamaguchi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-01

5.  The Scandinavian multicenter hemodynamic evaluation of the SJM Regent aortic valve.

Authors:  Jon Offstad; Kai Andersen; Per Paulsson; Jesper Andreasson; Ulf Kjellman; Oluf Lundblad; Karl Gunnar Engstrøm; Rune Haaverstad; Jan L Svennevig
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  Numerical and in-vitro experimental assessment of the performance of a novel designed expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene stentless bi-leaflet valve for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Guangyu Zhu; Munirah Binte Ismail; Masakazu Nakao; Qi Yuan; Joon Hock Yeo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Early and mid-term outcome in terms of functional and hemodynamic performance of the st. Jude regent 19-mm aortic mechanical prosthesis versus 19-mm carpentier edwards aortic biological prosthesis.

Authors:  Edvin Prifti; Massimo Bonacchi; Fadil Ademaj; Gabriele Giunti; Giampiero Esposito; Arben Baboci; Gani Bajraktari; Altin Veshti; Aurel Demiraj; Vittorio Vanini
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  On-X versus St Jude Medical Regent mechanical aortic valve prostheses: early haemodynamics.

Authors:  Robert Xu; Mohammad Rahnavardi; Bradley Pitman; Masoumeh Shirazi; Robert Stuklis; James Edwards; Michael Worthington
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2017-02-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.