Literature DB >> 9930433

Hemodynamic features of the freestyle aortic bioprosthesis compared with stented bioprosthesis.

J G Dumesnil1, M H LeBlanc, P C Cartier, J Métras, D Desaulniers, D P Doyle, M D Lemieux, G Raymond.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Freestyle prosthesis is a new stentless aortic bioprosthesis. Anticipated benefits are improved hemodynamics and increased longevity.
METHODS: Doppler echocardiograms were performed early and at 3 to 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after operation in 157 patients (69 men, 88 women, aged 48 to 85 years) with this prosthesis, and results were compared with hemodynamic data in patients with Intact and Mosaic stented bioprostheses.
RESULTS: Distinctive features of the prosthesis compared with stented prostheses are (1) an increase in effective orifice area (+0.15+/-0.26 cm2; p < 0.05) and a decrease in mean gradient (-3.5+/-4.0 mm Hg; p < 0.001) during the first 3 to 6 months postoperatively and stabilization thereafter; (2) a markedly lower mean gradient at 1 year after operation (average, 6+/-4 mm Hg) than in stented prostheses (Intact, 22+/-8 mm Hg; Mosaic, 12+/-6 mm Hg); (3) in contrast to stented prostheses, in vivo effective orifice areas much lower (-0.91+/-0.35 cm2) than those calculated in vitro; (4) as in stented prostheses, the indexed effective orifice area (cm2/m2) is the best predictor (r = 0.77 at 1 year) of the mean gradient after operation; and (5) similar incidence of aortic regurgitation (trivial or mild, 34% versus 29% in Intact).
CONCLUSIONS: The hemodynamics of the Freestyle are very satisfactory and represent a marked improvement in comparison to stented prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9930433     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01119-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  8 in total

Review 1.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention.

Authors:  P Pibarot; J G Dumesnil
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Morphometrical and biomechanical analyses of a stentless bioprosthetic valve: an implication to avoid potential primary tissue failure.

Authors:  Hiroki Takaya; Shinya Masuda; Masaaki Naganuma; Ichiro Yoshioka; Goro Takahashi; Masatoshi Akiyama; Osamu Adachi; Kiichiro Kumagai; Shukei Sugita; Yoshikatsu Saiki
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-06-28

Review 3.  Diagnostic evaluation of left-sided prosthetic heart valve dysfunction.

Authors:  Jesse Habets; Ricardo P Budde; Petr Symersky; Renee B van den Brink; Bas A de Mol; Willem P Mali; Lex A van Herwerden; Steven A Chamuleau
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Early results of Bentall-type operations during the last 10 years: comparison of mechanical valves and stentless bioprostheses.

Authors:  Koki Nakamura; Tomohiro Asai; Mikiko Murakami; Yosuke Saitoh; Hiroki Yamaguchi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-01

Review 5.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch - what cardiac anesthesiologists need to know?

Authors:  Kathirvel Subramaniam; Soheyla Nazarnia
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

6.  Complementary Role of the Computed Biomodelling through Finite Element Analysis and Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of Transcatheter Heart Valve Thrombosis.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Laura Mazzocchi; Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh; Simone Morganti; Jean-Louis Sablayrolles; Christophe Acar; Ferdinando Auricchio
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Effect of surgeon on transprosthetic gradients after aortic valve replacement with Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis and its consequences: a follow-up study in 587 patients.

Authors:  Alexander Albert; Ines Florath; Ulrich Rosendahl; Wael Hassanein; Eberhard V Hodenberg; Stefan Bauer; Ina Ennker; Jürgen Ennker
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  In Vitro Study of a Stentless Aortic Bioprosthesis Made of Bacterial Cellulose.

Authors:  Kinga Dawidowska; Piotr Siondalski; Magdalena Kołaczkowska
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.495

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.