Literature DB >> 17440038

Understanding hearing through deafness.

Robert V Shannon1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17440038      PMCID： PMC1855393          DOI： 10.1073/pnas.0702220104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN： 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

1.  Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age.

Authors:  L S Eisenberg; R V Shannon; A S Martinez; J Wygonski; A Boothroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Cross-modal plasticity and cochlear implants.

Authors:  D S Lee; J S Lee; S H Oh; S K Kim; J W Kim; J K Chung; M C Lee; C S Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-11       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.

Authors:  Michael K Qin; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-04-22

6.  Improved speech perception in adult congenitally deafened cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Stephanie Moody-Antonio; Sumiko Takayanagi; Ann Masuda; Edward T Auer; Laurel Fisher; Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech.

Authors:  Virginie van Wassenhove; Ken W Grant; David Poeppel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Evidence that cochlear-implanted deaf patients are better multisensory integrators.

Authors:  J Rouger; S Lagleyre; B Fraysse; S Deneve; O Deguine; P Barone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Auditory-visual fusion in speech perception in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Efrat A Schorr; Nathan A Fox; Virginie van Wassenhove; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Cued speech for enhancing speech perception and first language development of children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jacqueline Leybaert; Carol J LaSasso
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

2.  On the balance of envelope and temporal fine structure in the encoding of speech in the early auditory system.

Authors:  Shihab Shamma; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Auditory implant research at the House Ear Institute 1989-2013.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Auditory Training: Evidence for Neural Plasticity in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Perspect Hear Hear Disord Res Res Diagn       Date:  2013-05

5.  Direct recordings from the auditory cortex in a cochlear implant user.

Authors:  Kirill V Nourski; Christine P Etler; John F Brugge; Hiroyuki Oya; Hiroto Kawasaki; Richard A Reale; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown; Matthew A Howard
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.