Literature DB >> 16339316

Auditory-visual fusion in speech perception in children with cochlear implants.

Efrat A Schorr1, Nathan A Fox, Virginie van Wassenhove, Eric I Knudsen.   

Abstract

Speech, for most of us, is a bimodal percept whenever we both hear the voice and see the lip movements of a speaker. Children who are born deaf never have this bimodal experience. We tested children who had been deaf from birth and who subsequently received cochlear implants for their ability to fuse the auditory information provided by their implants with visual information about lip movements for speech perception. For most of the children with implants (92%), perception was dominated by vision when visual and auditory speech information conflicted. For some, bimodal fusion was strong and consistent, demonstrating a remarkable plasticity in their ability to form auditory-visual associations despite the atypical stimulation provided by implants. The likelihood of consistent auditory-visual fusion declined with age at implant beyond 2.5 years, suggesting a sensitive period for bimodal integration in speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16339316      PMCID: PMC1317952          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0508862102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  16 in total

1.  Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation.

Authors:  John K Niparko
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Lexical influences in audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Lawrence Brancazio; Lawrence Brancazio
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Development of audiovisual comprehension skills in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Tonya R Bergeson; David B Pisoni; Rebecca A O Davis
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech.

Authors:  Virginie van Wassenhove; Ken W Grant; David Poeppel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Of kittens and kids: altered cortical maturation following profound deafness and cochlear implant use.

Authors:  C W Ponton; J J Eggermont
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  A sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants: implications for age of implantation.

Authors:  Anu Sharma; Michael F Dorman; Anthony J Spahr
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  The contribution of fundamental frequency, amplitude envelope, and voicing duration cues to speechreading in normal-hearing subjects.

Authors:  K W Grant; L H Ardell; P K Kuhl; D W Sparks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Use of visual information for phonetic perception.

Authors:  Q Summerfield
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.759

10.  Effects of age at implantation in young children.

Authors:  Karen Iler Kirk; Richard T Miyamoto; Cara L Lento; Elizabeth Ying; Tara O'Neill; Beverly Fears
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2002-05
View more
  59 in total

Review 1.  Plasticity in the developing auditory cortex: evidence from children with sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Garrett Cardon; Julia Campbell; Anu Sharma
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Bilateral reorganization of posterior temporal cortices in post-lingual deafness and its relation to cochlear implant outcome.

Authors:  Diane S Lazard; Hyo-Jeong Lee; Eric Truy; Anne-Lise Giraud
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The influence of a sensitive period for auditory-visual integration in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Phillip M Gilley; Anu Sharma; Teresa V Mitchell; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Neural correlates of interindividual differences in children's audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Audrey R Nath; Eswen E Fava; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Children with a history of SLI show reduced sensitivity to audiovisual temporal asynchrony: an ERP study.

Authors:  Natalya Kaganovich; Jennifer Schumaker; Laurence B Leonard; Dana Gustafson; Danielle Macias
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 6.  Development of multisensory integration from the perspective of the individual neuron.

Authors:  Barry E Stein; Terrence R Stanford; Benjamin A Rowland
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Evidence that cochlear-implanted deaf patients are better multisensory integrators.

Authors:  J Rouger; S Lagleyre; B Fraysse; S Deneve; O Deguine; P Barone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Early experience and multisensory perceptual narrowing.

Authors:  David J Lewkowicz
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.038

9.  Transient Hearing Loss Within a Critical Period Causes Persistent Changes to Cellular Properties in Adult Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Todd M Mowery; Vibhakar C Kotak; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 10.  Perspectives on multisensory experience and cognitive development in infants with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Mary K Fagan; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2009-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.