Literature DB >> 21037163

Now you see it ... and now again: semantic interference reflects lexical competition in speech production with and without articulation.

Rasha Abdel Rahman1, Sabrina Aristei.   

Abstract

Semantic interference effects in the picture-word interference (PWI) paradigm have long been assumed to reflect competitive mechanisms during lexical selection, a core component of the speech production system. However, recent observations of facilitative effects have cast doubt on the usefulness of the paradigm for investigating lexicalization, and on the existence of lexical competition in general. An alternative proposal suggests that lexical selection is not by competition, and that interference effects reflect articulatory processes outside the lexical system. Here, we contrast these theoretical alternatives with semantic distractor effects in the PWI paradigm. In two tasks, pictures were either overtly named or the names were manually classified. Interference effects of comparable magnitude were observed in both response modalities, regardless of whether the names were articulated or not. This finding supports lexical competition models and suggests that the articulators are not the source of interference in the PWI paradigm. Supplemental materials for this article may be downloaded from http://pbr.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21037163     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.5.657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  17 in total

1.  The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: does the response set matter?

Authors:  A Caramazza; A Costa
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-05-15

2.  Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production.

Authors:  M F Damian; R C Martin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Comparing cortical activations for silent and overt speech using event-related fMRI.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Thomas H Carr; Yue Cao
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks.

Authors:  Markus F Damian; Jeffrey S Bowers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

Review 5.  A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking.

Authors:  A Roelofs
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-03

6.  Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm.

Authors:  Eva Belke; Antje S Meyer; Markus F Damian
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2005-05

7.  Now you see it, now you don't: on turning semantic interference into facilitation in a Stroop-like task.

Authors:  Matthew Finkbeiner; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect.

Authors:  Gary M Oppenheim; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-04-02

9.  When bees hamper the production of honey: lexical interference from associates in speech production.

Authors:  Rasha Abdel Rahman; Alissa Melinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis.

Authors:  Niels Janssen; Walter Schirm; Bradford Z Mahon; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  14 in total

1.  The Separability of Morphological Processes from Semantic Meaning and Syntactic Class in Production of Single Words: Evidence from the Hebrew Root Morpheme.

Authors:  Avital Deutsch
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-02

2.  The case for subphonemic attenuation in inner speech: comment on Corley, Brocklehurst, and Moat (2011).

Authors:  Gary M Oppenheim
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Semantic interference in the picture-word interference task: Is there a pre-lexical, conceptual contribution to the effect?

Authors:  Jörg D Jescheniak; Stefan Wöhner; Hanna S Bethcke; Marie C Beaupain
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

4.  Web-based language production experiments: Semantic interference assessment is robust for spoken and typed response modalities.

Authors:  Kirsten Stark; Cornelia van Scherpenberg; Hellmuth Obrig; Rasha Abdel Rahman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04-04

5.  Lexical selection in bimodal bilinguals: ERP evidence from picture-word interference.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Megan Mott; Gabriela Meade; Phillip J Holcomb; Katherine J Midgley
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  Translation Distractors Facilitate Production in Single- and Mixed-Language Picture Naming.

Authors:  Brendan Tomoschuk; Victor S Ferreira; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.842

7.  Brain Oscillations and Functional Connectivity during Overt Language Production.

Authors:  Arne Ewald; Sabrina Aristei; Guido Nolte; Rasha Abdel Rahman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-06-07

8.  Bilingual picture-word studies constrain theories of lexical selection.

Authors:  Matthew L Hall
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-12-29

9.  Resolving competition when naming an object in a multiple-object display.

Authors:  Frank Oppermann; Jörg D Jescheniak; Frauke Görges
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-02

10.  Distinct patterns of brain activity characterise lexical activation and competition in spoken word production.

Authors:  Vitória Piai; Ardi Roelofs; Ole Jensen; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen; Mathilde Bonnefond
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.