Literature DB >> 21718214

Density pervades: an analysis of phonological neighbourhood density effects in aphasic speakers with different types of naming impairment.

Erica L Middleton1, Myrna F Schwartz.   

Abstract

We investigated the influence of phonological neighbourhood density (PND) on the performance of aphasic speakers whose naming impairments differentially implicate phonological or semantic stages of lexical access. A word comes from a dense phonological neighbourhood if many words sound like it. Limited evidence suggests that higher density facilitates naming in aphasic speakers, as it does in healthy speakers. Using well-controlled stimuli, Experiment 1 confirmed the influence of PND on accuracy and phonological error rates in two aphasic speakers with phonological processing deficits. In Experiments 2 and 3, we extended the investigation to an aphasic speaker who is prone to semantic errors, indicating a semantic deficit and/or a deficit in the mapping from semantics to words. This individual had higher accuracy, and fewer semantic errors, in naming targets from high- than from low-density neighbourhoods. It is argued that the Results provide strong support for interactive approaches to lexical access, where reverberatory feedback between word- and phoneme-level lexical representations not only facilitates phonological level processes but also privileges the selection of a target word over its semantic competitors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21718214      PMCID: PMC3132149          DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2011.570325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0264-3294            Impact factor:   2.468


  55 in total

Review 1.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  The specific-word frequency effect: implications for the representation of homophones in speech production.

Authors:  A Caramazza; A Costa; M Miozzo; Y Bi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Phonological neighborhood effects in aphasic speech errors: spontaneous and structured contexts.

Authors:  Jean K Gordon
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: effects of phonotactic probability and onset density.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Jonna Armbruster; Shinying Chu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking.

Authors:  A Roelofs
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-03

6.  A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Paul A Luce
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-08

7.  The representation of homophones: evidence from the distractor-frequency effect.

Authors:  Michele Miozzo; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect.

Authors:  Gary M Oppenheim; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-04-02

9.  Phonological priming effects on word retrieval and tip-of-the-tongue experiences in young and older adults.

Authors:  L E James; D M Burke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: the role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  8 in total

1.  The Aging Neighborhood: Phonological Density in Naming.

Authors:  Jean K Gordon; Jake C Kurczek
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2014-01-01

2.  Semantic and lexical features of words dissimilarly affected by non-fluent, logopenic, and semantic primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Jet M J Vonk; Roel Jonkers; H Isabel Hubbard; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Adam M Brickman; Loraine K Obler
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 2.892

3.  Friends and foes in the lexicon: homophone naming in aphasia.

Authors:  Erica L Middleton; Qi Chen; Jay Verkuilen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Competition and cooperation among similar representations: toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Daniel Mirman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Validation of the Iowa Test of Consonant Perception.

Authors:  Jason Geller; Ann Holmes; Adam Schwalje; Joel I Berger; Phillip E Gander; Inyong Choi; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.482

Review 6.  Theoretical analysis of word production deficits in adult aphasia.

Authors:  Myrna F Schwartz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Objective support for subjective reports of successful inner speech in two people with aphasia.

Authors:  William Hayward; Sarah F Snider; George Luta; Rhonda B Friedman; Peter E Turkeltaub
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  When phonological neighborhood density both facilitates and impedes: Age of acquisition and name agreement interact with phonological neighborhood during word production.

Authors:  Hossein Karimi; Michele Diaz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.